Not if it is this one: [image: Inline image 1]
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > So if as a tenant, I have a toilet professionally installed in the living > room, that wouldn't be damage? > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Brett A Mansfield < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Tell that to Comcast or century link. >> >> I as a landlord and a WISP owner am conflicted on this. I don't think the >> ISP should be held responsible unless they did a shady job. The renter >> needs to know the rules of the place. The ISP should always ask if they are >> the owner of the place. If the renter says they are the owner, wether they >> signed something or not, then the renter is responsible. >> >> I disagree with you about what is damage. If it's done correctly it's not >> damage. Otherwise when they install any piping for the bathrooms or kitchen >> would be damage. >> >> If it's done professionally then everything is sealed and no warranty is >> voided...unless you're dealing with a shady builder. >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> >> On Mar 17, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Travis Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Installing a J-mount (drilling holes in a roof) and cable penetration >> (drilling a hole in the side of the house) is DEFINITELY damage to the >> property. Any warranty on the roof becomes null and void unless a certified >> roofer does the work and certifies the install. Drilling a hole through the >> siding and house is also damage. >> >> Travis >> >> >> On 3/17/2015 11:28 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >> I think we differ on what constitutes damage. >> >> Installing a J-mount and a cable penetration, no. >> Not sealing the above properly and water or critters intrude upon the >> structure, yes. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Travis Johnson" <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:26:21 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna >> >> Tenants do not have the right to damage my property, regardless of their >> rights and due process. >> >> Travis >> >> On 3/17/2015 11:19 AM, John Woodfield wrote: >> >> Many landlords with that attitude end up criminally charged. There is >> such a thing as tenant rights and due process. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Mar 17, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> It sounds right to me. He owns the land and property. Owner is king >> of his castle. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Mar 17, 2015 1:13 PM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm calling BS on this. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> > On Mar 17, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Travis Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > You still have to work it out with the actual owner, regardless of >>> what the tenant told you or even signed. >>> > >>> > Travis >>> > >>> >> On 3/17/2015 10:16 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >>> >>> On 3/17/15 9:11, Travis Johnson wrote: >>> >>> I would talk to the tenant and try and resolve things, but the ISP is >>> >>> who did the actual damage to the property, without permission. Yes, >>> they >>> >>> "assumed" they had permission, but without a signed contract from the >>> >>> legal owner of the property, the ISP does not have permission to >>> cause >>> >>> damage to the property. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> What do you do if your tenants misrepresent themselves as the owner >>> with authority? >>> >> >>> >> ~Seth >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> > -- Harold Bledsoe
