That's unfair! but will they be in Ohio in 7-10 days?
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:
> I can drive to my distributor in about 45 minutes if I'm in a hurry.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> until the distributors get them... don't forget to add at least a few
>> more days.
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 6-9 today!!! Hey oh
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In 7-10 days, right??
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I thought it was 24v and a 2amp power supply, so maybe 25 watts? I'll
>>>>> bust out the amp meter when it finally shows up at my door!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If I remember correctly, ubnt said about 15 watts when they announced
>>>>>> the AF5x.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have heard 15ish on a netonix port.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On March 21, 2015 7:18:58 AM AKDT, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value.
>>>>>>>> The data sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE
>>>>>>>> injector. That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts.
>>>>>>>> Anyone have one installed that has measured actual power consumption?
>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>> they're running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12
>>>>>>>> watts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT
>>>>>>>> list awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding
>>>>>>>> to it
>>>>>>>> based on input from the community.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Ty
>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hot damn! Who made that?!?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oops let's try again. How about this chart...
>>>>>>>>> ubnt radio comparison
>>>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Ty
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <
>>>>>>>>> tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Try this chart.
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would
>>>>>>>>>>> also have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently
>>>>>>>>>>> approved
>>>>>>>>>>> for. And what power they take.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM
>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in
>>>>>>>>>>> the AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple
>>>>>>>>>>> sizes).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam = all integrated
>>>>>>>>>>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for
>>>>>>>>>>> different areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular
>>>>>>>>>>> here and
>>>>>>>>>>> not as popular in other parts of the world).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Would chart help?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some
>>>>>>>>>>>> cases need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam,
>>>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam
>>>>>>>>>>>> AC, PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference
>>>>>>>>>>>> between a
>>>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in
>>>>>>>>>>>> dB and
>>>>>>>>>>>> the other by antenna size in mm.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because
>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s crazy small?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Then there’s the M vs W thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My head hurts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here you go:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP
>>>>>>>>>>>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism
>>>>>>>>>>>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize
>>>>>>>>>>>> PTP and PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> performance
>>>>>>>>>>>> reason to. The cost is same either way...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy <
>>>>>>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism
>>>>>>>>>>>>> only?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> foot HP
>>>>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I dont
>>>>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptp and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> three products there?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> team.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
