That's unfair! but will they be in Ohio in 7-10 days? On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> I can drive to my distributor in about 45 minutes if I'm in a hurry. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> until the distributors get them... don't forget to add at least a few >> more days. >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> 6-9 today!!! Hey oh >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> In 7-10 days, right?? >>>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I thought it was 24v and a 2amp power supply, so maybe 25 watts? I'll >>>>> bust out the amp meter when it finally shows up at my door! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If I remember correctly, ubnt said about 15 watts when they announced >>>>>> the AF5x. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I have heard 15ish on a netonix port. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On March 21, 2015 7:18:58 AM AKDT, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value. >>>>>>>> The data sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE >>>>>>>> injector. That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts. >>>>>>>> Anyone have one installed that has measured actual power consumption? >>>>>>>> If >>>>>>>> they're running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12 >>>>>>>> watts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> bp >>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT >>>>>>>> list awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding >>>>>>>> to it >>>>>>>> based on input from the community. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Ty >>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hot damn! Who made that?!? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> bp >>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oops let's try again. How about this chart... >>>>>>>>> ubnt radio comparison >>>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Ty >>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" < >>>>>>>>> tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Try this chart. >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would >>>>>>>>>>> also have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently >>>>>>>>>>> approved >>>>>>>>>>> for. And what power they take. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in >>>>>>>>>>> the AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple >>>>>>>>>>> sizes). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam = all integrated >>>>>>>>>>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for >>>>>>>>>>> different areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular >>>>>>>>>>> here and >>>>>>>>>>> not as popular in other parts of the world). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Would chart help? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some >>>>>>>>>>>> cases need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, >>>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam >>>>>>>>>>>> AC, PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference >>>>>>>>>>>> between a >>>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in >>>>>>>>>>>> dB and >>>>>>>>>>>> the other by antenna size in mm. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because >>>>>>>>>>>> it’s crazy small? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Then there’s the M vs W thing. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My head hurts. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM >>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here you go: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP >>>>>>>>>>>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism >>>>>>>>>>>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize >>>>>>>>>>>> PTP and PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a >>>>>>>>>>>> performance >>>>>>>>>>>> reason to. The cost is same either way... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the >>>>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >>>>>>>>>>>>> only? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> foot HP >>>>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but >>>>>>>>>>>>> I dont >>>>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of >>>>>>>>>>>>> ptp and >>>>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link >>>>>>>>>>>>> is there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in >>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of >>>>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the >>>>>>>>>>>>> three products there? >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't >>>>>>>>>>>>> see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part >>>>>>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >