I've been wondering what AirPrism is. Does it make rainbows?
Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some cases need
better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC,
PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference between a
NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB
and the other by antenna size in mm.
And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s crazy
small?
Then there’s the M vs W thing.
My head hurts.
*From:* Ben Moore <mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
*Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
Here you go:
Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP
PTP - PTP only, airPrism
PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism
These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP and
PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a performance
reason to. The cost is same either way...
How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only
connectorized units?
What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only?
Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we
already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot
HP parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios,
but I dont know whats what now, is this a permanent separation
with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this two things that are going to
converge?
Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is
there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of
performance? (future demand is a factor as well)
Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three
products there?
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.
