And since the card is going to be trapped in a similarly sized enclosure
with slightly more power consumption, it's probably a good indication.

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, that is why I mentioned that it was the internal site monitor
> temperature.  Forrest knows almost exactly how far off it is from the
> ambient temperature.
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> That probe is a lot warmer than the enclosure.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> On May 18, 2015 10:23 PM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The coldest that I saw INSIDE our enclosures this year (accordint to
>>> SiteMonitor internal temperature) was 0-C (32-F).  Last year was much
>>> colder but back then I was using the APC for temperature and backup, and
>>> that graph data has all been deleted.  I can't say for sure if the
>>> temperature in the box was lower, but I doubt it would go too far below 32
>>> with all the equipment and batteries in the boxes.
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Wouldn't the simple answer be to offer the device and SD card as
>>>> separate items?  Then on your site you say, "If you want to have storage
>>>> with the same industrial temperature range as the rest of my product line
>>>> then buy this card, or supply your own at your own risk."
>>>>
>>>> Everybody selling fiber to the radio with an SFP slot does it that
>>>> way.  I always buy their SFP module.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/18/2015 10:09 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   What is the lowest temperature that each of you would normally
>>>> expect to see in your enclosures?
>>>>
>>>> The reason I'm asking is that I'm in the process of developing up a few
>>>> new products.
>>>>
>>>>  To date, all of the packetflux products are designed with components
>>>> rated -40 to +85C (I.E way cold to way hot).    I'd like to retain this
>>>> rating, but I'm running into a minor snag:
>>>>
>>>>  For storage, I'm planning on integrating a SD card (probably microSD)
>>>> in a socket.   I only need a GB or so, and SD card memory is inexpensive at
>>>> that range.
>>>>
>>>>  Unfortunately, all the reasonably priced SD cards are only rated down
>>>> to about -25C or -13F. which are about ~$3 in qty.   "Industrial
>>>> temperature range" ones which are good down to -40C/F are available but
>>>> they add at least $30 to the cost for non-name brand, and even more for
>>>> known brands.  When you're talking about a $100 end-user price, a $30 1GB
>>>> SD card seems excessive - and probably isn't even possible if I want to
>>>> meet the $100 price with some margin.
>>>>
>>>>  So, I'm currently playing the 'what options do I have' game.   I hate
>>>> to ship a product only rated down to -25C/-13F, but I know for at least a
>>>> large chunk of my customer base they never see below this temperature,
>>>> especially when you add a watt of power dissipation in the case with the
>>>> device.  Which leads me back to my original question:  What's the lowest
>>>> temperature most people would expect to see inside their enclosures.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>     *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>>>> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com
>>>>  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>>>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux>  <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>


-- 
*Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
[email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux>

Reply via email to