Sean, No problem!
Cambium 450/EPMP behave the same way I am pretty sure without looking at my notes. This post describes it perfectly and also has a raw dump of the dhcp request: http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636 OPTION: 82 ( 29) Relay Agent Information Circuit-ID 0a:00:3e:XX:XX:XX #AP MAC Remote-ID 0a:00:3e:YY:YY:YY #SU Wireless MAC That means that even if the client is in bridge mode the only mac address you need to track is the subscriber unit. I do not know any powercode specific stuff but I am looking at implementing with DHCP ISC. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: > Hey joe, > > Yeah we are mocking it up in our lab right now. Mainly need to know what > MAC gets sent for all the different interfaces - management, NAT enabled, > bridged etc. > > Powercode will only let you add one IP and MAC per device. Since we are > in the process of importing all our data for the migration to PC I'd like > to set it all up now to be ready for option 82 in the future ;) > > Joe, do you mind if our network engineer Elijah contacts you off list?? > > Thanks, > > Sean > > On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote: > >> I plan on implementing it with cambium both 450/epmp. Any specific >> questions? I learned a lot by taking a setting up a dhcp server with >> whatever verbose logging turned on and watching the requests. >> >> On Aug 18, 2016 8:13 PM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm almost certain someone does... But I'm not 100% >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Aug 18, 2016 8:51 PM, "Sean Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >>> >>>> Powercode said they had never done it and didn't know anyone who had. >>>> (I was kinda surprised at that response) >>>> >>>> Figured I'd check to see if y'all had used it. >>>> >>>> -Sean >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Have you contacted Powercode about this or no? I figure they'd know, >>>>> their wisp is Canopy. >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 18, 2016 8:35 PM, "Sean Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We are in the process of migrating to powercode...it's not an easy >>>>>> task but I think it will be well worth it. Lots of details to figure out >>>>>> lol. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Sean >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Tushar Patel <tpa...@ecpi.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You moved to powercode!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tushar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > On Aug 18, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Hey gang, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Any experts out there have experience with DHCP option 82 + Canopy >>>>>>> + Powercode? If so can I pick your brain??? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Sean >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>
