Thx joe, So if it sends the same 0a:00:3e MAC for the bridged device, how do you get the dhcp server to send the management IP to the SM since that would be the same MAC??
-Sean On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote: > Sean, > > No problem! > > Cambium 450/EPMP behave the same way I am pretty sure without looking at > my notes. This post describes it perfectly and also has a raw dump of the > dhcp request: http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP- > 450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636 > > OPTION: 82 ( 29) Relay Agent Information > Circuit-ID 0a:00:3e:XX:XX:XX #AP MAC > Remote-ID 0a:00:3e:YY:YY:YY #SU Wireless MAC > > That means that even if the client is in bridge mode the only mac address > you need to track is the subscriber unit. I do not know any powercode > specific stuff but I am looking at implementing with DHCP ISC. > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af...@zirkel.us');>> wrote: > >> Hey joe, >> >> Yeah we are mocking it up in our lab right now. Mainly need to know what >> MAC gets sent for all the different interfaces - management, NAT enabled, >> bridged etc. >> >> Powercode will only let you add one IP and MAC per device. Since we are >> in the process of importing all our data for the migration to PC I'd like >> to set it all up now to be ready for option 82 in the future ;) >> >> Joe, do you mind if our network engineer Elijah contacts you off list?? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Sean >> >> On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jno...@lrcomm.com');>> wrote: >> >>> I plan on implementing it with cambium both 450/epmp. Any specific >>> questions? I learned a lot by taking a setting up a dhcp server with >>> whatever verbose logging turned on and watching the requests. >>> >>> On Aug 18, 2016 8:13 PM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm almost certain someone does... But I'm not 100% >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Aug 18, 2016 8:51 PM, "Sean Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Powercode said they had never done it and didn't know anyone who had. >>>>> (I was kinda surprised at that response) >>>>> >>>>> Figured I'd check to see if y'all had used it. >>>>> >>>>> -Sean >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Josh Luthman < >>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Have you contacted Powercode about this or no? I figure they'd know, >>>>>> their wisp is Canopy. >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 18, 2016 8:35 PM, "Sean Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We are in the process of migrating to powercode...it's not an easy >>>>>>> task but I think it will be well worth it. Lots of details to figure >>>>>>> out >>>>>>> lol. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Sean >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Tushar Patel <tpa...@ecpi.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You moved to powercode!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tushar >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > On Aug 18, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Hey gang, >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Any experts out there have experience with DHCP option 82 + >>>>>>>> Canopy + Powercode? If so can I pick your brain??? >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Thanks, >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Sean >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
