Hummmm that's the conclusion we were coming to also.
I'm trying to find a way to make it all automagic but that
seems not possible :-/
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com>
wrote:
From how I understand it that is not possible unless
you plan on managing via the public IP.
Option 82, in its simplest form, just allows accounting
via the SU mac address, along with what 'circuit' (AP)
it came from. I think in your situation if you want to
use powercode to hand out public addresses you will
need a static management network for CPEs.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Sean Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Thx joe,
So if it sends the same 0a:00:3e MAC for the
bridged device, how do you get the dhcp server to
send the management IP to the SM since that would
be the same MAC??
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak
<jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
Sean,
No problem!
Cambium 450/EPMP behave the same way I am
pretty sure without looking at my notes. This
post describes it perfectly and also has a raw
dump of the dhcp request:
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636
<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636>
OPTION: 82 ( 29) Relay Agent Information
Circuit-ID 0a:00:3e:XX:XX:XX #AP MAC
Remote-ID 0a:00:3e:YY:YY:YY #SU Wireless MAC
That means that even if the client is in bridge
mode the only mac address you need to track is
the subscriber unit. I do not know any
powercode specific stuff but I am looking at
implementing with DHCP ISC.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Sean Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Hey joe,
Yeah we are mocking it up in our lab right
now. Mainly need to know what MAC gets sent
for all the different interfaces -
management, NAT enabled, bridged etc.
Powercode will only let you add one IP and
MAC per device. Since we are in the
process of importing all our data for the
migration to PC I'd like to set it all up
now to be ready for option 82 in the future ;)
Joe, do you mind if our network engineer
Elijah contacts you off list??
Thanks,
Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak
<jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
I plan on implementing it with cambium
both 450/epmp. Any specific questions?
I learned a lot by taking a setting up
a dhcp server with whatever verbose
logging turned on and watching the
requests.
On Aug 18, 2016 8:13 PM, "Josh Luthman"
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
I'm almost certain someone does...
But I'm not 100%
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2016 8:51 PM, "Sean
Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Powercode said they had never
done it and didn't know anyone
who had. (I was kinda surprised
at that response)
Figured I'd check to see if
y'all had used it.
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016,
Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:
Have you contacted
Powercode about this or
no? I figure they'd know,
their wisp is Canopy.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
<tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343
<tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2016 8:35 PM,
"Sean Heskett"
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
We are in the process
of migrating to
powercode...it's not an
easy task but I think
it will be well worth
it. Lots of details to
figure out lol.
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18,
2016, Tushar Patel
<tpa...@ecpi.com> wrote:
You moved to
powercode!!!
Tushar
> On Aug 18, 2016,
at 6:16 PM, Sean
Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us>
wrote:
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Any experts out
there have
experience with
DHCP option 82 +
Canopy +
Powercode? If so
can I pick your
brain???
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
>
