Hummmm that's the conclusion we were coming to also.
I'm trying to find a way to make it all automagic but that
seems not possible :-/
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com>
wrote:
From how I understand it that is not possible unless you
plan on managing via the public IP.
Option 82, in its simplest form, just allows accounting
via the SU mac address, along with what 'circuit' (AP)
it came from. I think in your situation if you want to
use powercode to hand out public addresses you will need
a static management network for CPEs.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Sean Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Thx joe,
So if it sends the same 0a:00:3e MAC for the bridged
device, how do you get the dhcp server to send the
management IP to the SM since that would be the same
MAC??
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak
<jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
Sean,
No problem!
Cambium 450/EPMP behave the same way I am pretty
sure without looking at my notes. This post
describes it perfectly and also has a raw dump
of the dhcp request:
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636
<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636>
OPTION: 82 ( 29) Relay Agent Information
Circuit-ID 0a:00:3e:XX:XX:XX #AP MAC
Remote-ID 0a:00:3e:YY:YY:YY #SU Wireless MAC
That means that even if the client is in bridge
mode the only mac address you need to track is
the subscriber unit. I do not know any powercode
specific stuff but I am looking at implementing
with DHCP ISC.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Sean Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Hey joe,
Yeah we are mocking it up in our lab right
now. Mainly need to know what MAC gets sent
for all the different interfaces -
management, NAT enabled, bridged etc.
Powercode will only let you add one IP and
MAC per device. Since we are in the process
of importing all our data for the migration
to PC I'd like to set it all up now to be
ready for option 82 in the future ;)
Joe, do you mind if our network engineer
Elijah contacts you off list??
Thanks,
Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak
<jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
I plan on implementing it with cambium
both 450/epmp. Any specific questions? I
learned a lot by taking a setting up a
dhcp server with whatever verbose
logging turned on and watching the requests.
On Aug 18, 2016 8:13 PM, "Josh Luthman"
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
I'm almost certain someone does...
But I'm not 100%
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2016 8:51 PM, "Sean
Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Powercode said they had never
done it and didn't know anyone
who had. (I was kinda surprised
at that response)
Figured I'd check to see if
y'all had used it.
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016,
Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
Have you contacted Powercode
about this or no? I figure
they'd know, their wisp is
Canopy.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
<tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343
<tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2016 8:35 PM,
"Sean Heskett"
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
We are in the process of
migrating to
powercode...it's not an
easy task but I think it
will be well worth it.
Lots of details to
figure out lol.
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18,
2016, Tushar Patel
<tpa...@ecpi.com> wrote:
You moved to
powercode!!!
Tushar
> On Aug 18, 2016,
at 6:16 PM, Sean
Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Any experts out
there have
experience with DHCP
option 82 + Canopy +
Powercode? If so
can I pick your brain???
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
>