Hummmm that's the conclusion we were coming to also.
I'm trying to find a way to make it all automagic but that seems
not possible :-/
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jno...@lrcomm.com');>> wrote:
From how I understand it that is not possible unless you plan
on managing via the public IP.
Option 82, in its simplest form, just allows accounting via
the SU mac address, along with what 'circuit' (AP) it came
from. I think in your situation if you want to use powercode
to hand out public addresses you will need a static
management network for CPEs.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Sean Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Thx joe,
So if it sends the same 0a:00:3e MAC for the bridged
device, how do you get the dhcp server to send the
management IP to the SM since that would be the same MAC??
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak
<jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
Sean,
No problem!
Cambium 450/EPMP behave the same way I am pretty sure
without looking at my notes. This post describes it
perfectly and also has a raw dump of the dhcp
request:
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636
<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636>
OPTION: 82 ( 29) Relay Agent Information
Circuit-ID 0a:00:3e:XX:XX:XX #AP MAC
Remote-ID 0a:00:3e:YY:YY:YY #SU Wireless MAC
That means that even if the client is in bridge mode
the only mac address you need to track is the
subscriber unit. I do not know any powercode specific
stuff but I am looking at implementing with DHCP ISC.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Sean Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Hey joe,
Yeah we are mocking it up in our lab right now.
Mainly need to know what MAC gets sent for all
the different interfaces - management, NAT
enabled, bridged etc.
Powercode will only let you add one IP and MAC
per device. Since we are in the process of
importing all our data for the migration to PC
I'd like to set it all up now to be ready for
option 82 in the future ;)
Joe, do you mind if our network engineer Elijah
contacts you off list??
Thanks,
Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak
<jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
I plan on implementing it with cambium both
450/epmp. Any specific questions? I learned a
lot by taking a setting up a dhcp server with
whatever verbose logging turned on and
watching the requests.
On Aug 18, 2016 8:13 PM, "Josh Luthman"
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
I'm almost certain someone does... But
I'm not 100%
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2016 8:51 PM, "Sean Heskett"
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Powercode said they had never done it
and didn't know anyone who had. (I
was kinda surprised at that response)
Figured I'd check to see if y'all had
used it.
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Josh
Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:
Have you contacted Powercode
about this or no? I figure
they'd know, their wisp is Canopy.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
<tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343
<tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2016 8:35 PM, "Sean
Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
We are in the process of
migrating to powercode...it's
not an easy task but I think
it will be well worth it.
Lots of details to figure out
lol.
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016,
Tushar Patel
<tpa...@ecpi.com> wrote:
You moved to powercode!!!
Tushar
> On Aug 18, 2016, at
6:16 PM, Sean Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Any experts out there
have experience with DHCP
option 82 + Canopy +
Powercode? If so can I
pick your brain???
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
>
