I assume you're doing bridge mode? Use RADIUS to assign the SM's
management IP. Then DHCP + Op 82 is used for the customer equipment.
We just do static management IP on the SMs. Playing with NAT + DMZ on
the customer side. Traceroute and other ICMP responses don't work
through NAT mode, even with DMZ. And L2TP tunnels. I forget what else I
tested on my SM at home. So far I'm not too thrilled with it.
On 8/18/2016 10:08 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
Hummmm that's the conclusion we were coming to also.
I'm trying to find a way to make it all automagic but that seems not
possible :-/
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com
<mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com>> wrote:
From how I understand it that is not possible unless you plan on
managing via the public IP.
Option 82, in its simplest form, just allows accounting via the SU
mac address, along with what 'circuit' (AP) it came from. I think
in your situation if you want to use powercode to hand out public
addresses you will need a static management network for CPEs.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af...@zirkel.us');>> wrote:
Thx joe,
So if it sends the same 0a:00:3e MAC for the bridged device,
how do you get the dhcp server to send the management IP to
the SM since that would be the same MAC??
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jno...@lrcomm.com');>> wrote:
Sean,
No problem!
Cambium 450/EPMP behave the same way I am pretty sure
without looking at my notes. This post describes it
perfectly and also has a raw dump of the dhcp request:
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636
<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636>
OPTION: 82 ( 29) Relay Agent Information
Circuit-ID 0a:00:3e:XX:XX:XX #AP MAC
Remote-ID 0a:00:3e:YY:YY:YY #SU Wireless MAC
That means that even if the client is in bridge mode the
only mac address you need to track is the subscriber unit.
I do not know any powercode specific stuff but I am
looking at implementing with DHCP ISC.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Sean Heskett
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Hey joe,
Yeah we are mocking it up in our lab right now.
Mainly need to know what MAC gets sent for all the
different interfaces - management, NAT enabled,
bridged etc.
Powercode will only let you add one IP and MAC per
device. Since we are in the process of importing all
our data for the migration to PC I'd like to set it
all up now to be ready for option 82 in the future ;)
Joe, do you mind if our network engineer Elijah
contacts you off list??
Thanks,
Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak
<jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
I plan on implementing it with cambium both
450/epmp. Any specific questions? I learned a lot
by taking a setting up a dhcp server with whatever
verbose logging turned on and watching the requests.
On Aug 18, 2016 8:13 PM, "Josh Luthman"
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
I'm almost certain someone does... But I'm not
100%
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2016 8:51 PM, "Sean Heskett"
<af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Powercode said they had never done it and
didn't know anyone who had. (I was kinda
surprised at that response)
Figured I'd check to see if y'all had used
it.
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
Have you contacted Powercode about
this or no? I figure they'd know,
their wisp is Canopy.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 18, 2016 8:35 PM, "Sean
Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
We are in the process of migrating
to powercode...it's not an easy
task but I think it will be well
worth it. Lots of details to
figure out lol.
-Sean
On Thursday, August 18, 2016,
Tushar Patel <tpa...@ecpi.com> wrote:
You moved to powercode!!!
Tushar
> On Aug 18, 2016, at 6:16 PM,
Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us>
wrote:
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Any experts out there have
experience with DHCP option 82
+ Canopy + Powercode? If so
can I pick your brain???
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
>
