Hey, wait for me!
On 10/6/2016 10:39 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
my bad, 645 down equipment, about a third of that is monitored
routers. but even this number still makes me want to go there
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
You have 600 customers on 320 WiMAX? That would make a person
look forward to dying and going to the bad place.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy /sarcasm
*Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:54 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320
good night to bring down 600 customers on purpose, ive never done
that before
i know the water company called me yesterday about their system on
917.5 mhz croaking out on them, dont know what killed 900mhz, i
ficgured it was com ed pushing out fram eureka or wherever. if
they start puttin up wimax, i shooting every comed guy i see in
the cock with a pellet gun
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Jaime Solorza
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com <mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
GE MDS is pushing 3.65 SCADA allot
On Oct 6, 2016 8:17 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
George, is this due to some weird weather by you?
Oh, and one thing to consider if you have 3.65
interference, I found out ComEd is using 3.65 WiMAX for
smartgrid, I don’t know if this is the top of the
hierarchy for their 900 MHz stuff, or SCADA to
substations. One tower by me they have 4 sectors and I
think each AP only feeds 1-2 CPEs. It didn’t help that
they totally messed up the lat/lon of their tower when
they registered it in ULS. Once I looked at the CPE
locations and drew lines following the stated azimuth, I
saw they converged on a tower next to a ComEd facility.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy
/sarcasm
*Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320
lol well it wont be coming from us for a while, we are
going 3ghz silent
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:58 PM, George Skorup
<geo...@cbcast.com <mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
Dude, I'm seeing multipath and ducting like a
somebitch. Started around dusk. Don't beat your head
into your desk. I'm seeing some 11GHz links go from
their nominal -45ish to like -35 to -60 in just a
couple minutes, and BER alarms like crazy. This is teh
suck.
On 10/6/2016 8:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
There is some nutty madness going on on a large
portion of our 320 network, it has hit multiple
sites at once.
I know much of its self induced due to too many
marginal installs on very limited access points
good CINR to SMs, even matrix B I cant even get
into to manage.
uplink MCS for the most part looks good until i
get into the frame utilization, tons of 16qam 1/2
and 100% usage with only 6-12 mbps throughput
I have been shifting frequencies across the
network because it presented like interference,
and a change on one AP results in required cascade
changes across the 3ghz network since 320 sync
doesnt actually work.
APs are basically default layer 2, no profiles
changed, 7mhz channels mostly ABCD 90s and some
split APs. sub counts range from 10 to 35
I migrated a distant part of the network to 10mhz
channels and am not seeing this issue, but
subscriber counts are low
Im at my wits end on this nonsense and am about to
just put every AP on the network in SA mode to get
a visual on what my spectrum looks like
we did turn up a 450 facing southwest ten miles
south of another 320 AP thats facing south, it
blinded the SMs to the 320 on a near channel even
though they were only in the back lobe, but this
is far from the others
any advice from you other guys stuck with wimax
would be appreciated
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but
you don't see your team as part of yourself you
have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but
you don't see your team as part of yourself you
have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
