all this talk of the new units i opened our box of them, is there a guide for the 10/100 and gigabit powerinjector jumper settings per brand? is it just the same as http://tickets.packetflux.com/downloads/poeinjectorjumpers.pdf only with the pin order backward? and if a guy put a 3pin connector on the A/B selector, would that effectively put the two inputs in parallel?
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > Depends on the power circuitry on the airfiber. My guess is it would be > ok. > > If you have a base unit, you can actually turn off the sync on that port > and the injector will remember it, so you don't have to put a base unit in > the field with it, just for the programming. (You'd set the poweron > column for the sync row for that port to '0'). > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> I just received my first powerinjector + sync today. If I want to power >> some Airfibers with these do I need to turn the sync off for those ports? I >> don't see a jumper to turn off sync, is it ok to provider sync on a port >> with an Airfiber? Does it hurt anything? It looks to me like the only way >> to turn off sync is buy the additional site monitor base thing to hookup to >> it and turn it off through the web interface? >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:39 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: >> >>> I have four 5GHz 450i's running on our office tower fed from a GigE >>> PowerInjector+Sync. They're running 14.1.2. They received sync shortly >>> after boot, DFS, etc. BTW, no GigE-APC's in line on these yet. I'm like two >>> short at the moment. But we know that 1000Base-T and sync over power + the >>> older APC's don't play nice anyway. >>> >>> On 11/21/2016 1:23 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>> >>> I've had a couple of them where I wasn't getting sync and couldn't >>> figure out why... in one case (maybe both... I don't remember off hand), I >>> was getting sync to an ePMP, but not to a PMP450i 900mhz AP that were both >>> plugged into the same sync injector... I didn't really need sync on the >>> 900mhz at the time, so I just switched it to generate it's own timing, and >>> I haven't gotten around to trying to figure it out yet, but now I'm >>> wondering if it would eventually come up if I left it alone. >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/21/16 10:39, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> I had all the packet flux gear running for days, plugged in the 450i >>>>> and >>>>> started trying to figure out why it was not receiving sync. Half hour >>>>> or more later it said it was OK, so the delay had to be Cambium, not >>>>> Packetflux. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Check if the packetflux says it has fix and 1PPS is active on the >>>> binary tab and that the used pulse count is increasing on the analog tab. >>>> >>>> ~Seth >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* > Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 > forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> > <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
