>> The external in line fuse product is ready for prototyping. Let us know how this goes, if the test are successful, I would suggest making an 'external in-line fuse', which would make for a quick retrofit for existing modules out there .
Thanks. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 9:38:12 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > I would not put any surge protection on Netonix period, top or bottom. If it > is > POE and powered by a passive source you run a risk of smoking it with any > surge > suppressor. > I have two devices designed, one is an ancillary fuse to put inline with > Netonix. The second is adding fusing to my surge protectors if I can fit it > in. > The external in line fuse product is ready for prototyping. > From: David Coudron > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 7:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > We are also very interested in this topic. We will be building out 10 new > towers > in the next few months, and will be making the change to Netonix switches (we > had previously used a different type of switch). I the past we had put > Transtector surge protectors on the tower top and in the cabinet on the > ground. > From what you are saying in thread, we should not plan on surge protectors in > the cabinet, but what is the recommended change for the tower top, if any? > Thanks, > David Coudron > [email protected] | Mobile: 612-991-7474 > Advantenon, Inc. > [email protected] | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N , Suite 315 , Plymouth, MN 55447 | > www.advantenon.com | Phone: 800-704-4720 | Local: 612-454-1545 > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 8:29 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > If an impulse comes along and the surge suppressor clamps to ground, you run > the > risk of smoking the Netonix POE transformer. It will not protect itself > against > shorts. > From: Josh Baird > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 7:23 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > What exactly is the reason? We always run through your surge protectors before > connecting to Netonix. > On Mar 25, 2017, at 9:15 AM, Chuck McCown < [email protected] > wrote: >> Bypass ALL surge suppressors that are connected to Netonix, irrespective of >> manufacturer. >> From: [email protected] >> Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 5:41 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix >> So we should now bypass all our APC-type surge suppressors that are >> connected to >> Netonix? >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Chuck McCown < [email protected] > wrote: >>> I am going to fix this little problem... >>> Netonix will fix your port for something like $25 >>> From: Bill Prince >>> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 8:56 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix >>> Yeah. We accidentally hooked up an AF24 through a Cambium surge suppressor, >>> and >>> it fragged the port on the Netonix. We were swapping from something else >>> that >>> had been on the cable, and completely forgot that it was going through that >>> surge suppressor. Hard lesson learned. >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> On 3/24/2017 1:27 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: >>>> OK, had an exchange with Netonix today. It is just as Matt Hoppes said. You >>>> short out their POE and it will blow the Ethernet transformer. >>>> I really presumed they had circuitry like Forrest that could detect and >>>> shut >>>> down in an over current situation. They do have poly fuses which are slow >>>> to >>>> react and may protect it from a very brief short, but longer shorts will >>>> indeed >>>> harm the port feeding the transformer. >>>> So, Netonix is not active POE. I would say that on passive POE a plain >>>> surge >>>> suppressor should not be used. I am working some “non plain” surge >>>> suppressors >>>> now.... ;-) Stay tuned to this bat channel and a big thanks to Matt for >>>> forcing >>>> me to learn something new. It was painful, but I can do painful things >>>> when I >>>> have to. >>>> From: Chuck McCown >>>> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 10:01 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix >>>> tnx >>>> From: Josh Luthman >>>> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 9:47 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix >>>> chris.sisler >>>> ( A ) >>>> netlinx.net >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Chuck McCown < [email protected] > wrote: >>>>> Anyone know the email for the guy that runs Netonix?
