The old telephone drop wire with P clamps was good for perhaps 300 feet spans 
max.  

From: Jason McKemie 
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 9:35 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small Scale PON

Were you figuring on doing this lashed or just the flat drop cable? I've got a 
couple scenarios that I was looking at using 12ct flat drop, but the only way I 
can think of to get it in the air is by using wedge clamps. Not sure if these 
are good for the distance between some of the utility poles out there.

On Wednesday, March 29, 2017, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

  I think the idea is you can run a 12 strand aerial cable down a rural road.  
Since you're using this skinny cable, you can use a $40 closure to put a PON 
coupler in front of the customer prem.

  My quick estimate is the difference might be around $6,000 per mile.....that 
changes with assumptions on how many houses are on that mile and so on....maybe 
$4k to $6k is fairer.

  I don't have pricing from Calix.  I'm looking at Alphion...the ONT is pretty 
close to a routerboard.  The OLT is a lot more than a mikrotik switch, but cost 
per customer port (assuming 1:16 PON) is on par with a mid grade switch.  It's 
more than mikrotik, less than Juniper.  I can't share numbers due to NDA, but 
that's the idea.

  We're looking at doing a whole rural town with 50 miles of road and 300 
households.  I haven't gotten down to brass tacks yet, but on the surface it 
seems like the savings is enough to buy a really nice bucket truck.

  -Adam


  ------ Original Message ------
  From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
  To: af@afmug.com
  Sent: 3/27/2017 5:33:06 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small Scale PON


    Years ago, there was a break even point on active vs PON.  If you had 16 or 
more in an area that could take a PON it was worth doing the PON.
    But that was comparing Calix AE vs Calix PON.  If you do AE like Sterling I 
don't think PON is ever cost effective compared to Calix PON.

    With PON you still have to have a drop to each home.  The cost of  the 
cable is in the placement, not in the cable itself.
    So the question is, where do you place the splitter vs where do you place 
the switch and SFPs.  Personally, I would do it Sterling style on new 
greenfield.  The ONLY reason I do it with the expensive PON is we are a 
regulated common carrier with provider of last resort obligations.  I have to 
give POTS that is battery backed up, legally required to do this.

    Cannot risk a 911 call not going through due to a power outage etc.  Cannot 
trust the customer to not unplug a UPS.

    -----Original Message----- From: Adam Moffett
    Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 3:11 PM
    To: af@afmug.com
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small Scale PON

    Yeah, so PON vs AE was actually the next research project for me to
    tackle.

    It seems like there ought to be savings with PON because of lower fiber
    count.....lower fiber count ought to lead to smaller/cheaper enclosures.
    Less junk at the head end too.  I haven't gotten that far yet, but I
    was thinking I might "scrimp" with PON.  You're saying maybe not?



    ------ Original Message ------
    From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
    To: af@afmug.com
    Sent: 3/27/2017 4:54:08 PM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small Scale PON


      I would be worried that it will go the way of some of  their other ideas.
      Cheap... you get what you pay for.

      FTTH, I would rather pay more and know it will be solid and be around in 
the years to come.
      Not an area where you want to scrimp.  If you want to scrimp go active 
ethernet.

      -----Original Message----- From: Adam Moffett
      Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 12:56 PM
      To: af@afmug.com
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small Scale PON

      Well....I have to build with what's available today.  If I delay to wait
      for the next hot product, I'll always be waiting.

      Besides, I honestly don't know what Ubiquiti brings to the table that
      other vendors don't.  I suppose it will be cost competitive, but that's
      less important to me than having it just work.

      -Adam


      ------ Original Message ------
      From: "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net>
      To: af@afmug.com
      Sent: 3/27/2017 2:52:03 PM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small Scale PON


        With ubiquiti shipping real soon, you might want to wait

        Jon Langeler
        Michwave Technologies, Inc.



          On Mar 27, 2017, at 2:47 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

          I asked the Alphion sales rep about this.  He says the optics are 
coded, yes.  As far as mixing ONT from one vendor with an OLT from another he 
said in essence GPON is a standard, but it isn't usually tested across vendors 
so whether it works fine, works with bugs, or doesn't work at all is going to 
be a matter of chance.


          ------ Original Message ------
          From: fiber...@mail.com
          To: af@afmug.com
          Sent: 3/23/2017 2:54:04 PM
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small Scale PON


            No, generally speaking there is no crossvendor compatibility with 
GPON.

            Jared








Reply via email to