For the record, birds don't "pee". Their #1 and #2 are combined into one outlet, so they do something like 1-1/2 (neither 1 nor 2).
-bp On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > Well hell, that is almost TMI. I expected as such from this band. Sounds > like if they increase the sensitivity of the switchover mechanism it would > be a contender. > > *From:* Matt Hoppes > *Sent:* Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:38 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > Let me back up. > > We lose our IN link every time a bird pees. It generally holds up during > torrential down pours. > > Random fog events will cause it to become trashed. > > The link is .6 miles. I expected it to fade from time to time. The problem > for me is the fail over does not happen properly. > > It's a gosh darn USB dongle attached to a reflector dish. Don't expect too > much out of it. > > On Oct 19, 2017, at 18:28, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: > > How far is your shot? What channel are you using? > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt Hoppes > *Sent:* Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:26 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > > > I disagree. We lose our IN link every time it rains. And the 5GHz does not > fail over seemleasly at all. > > > > There is packet loss and high pings until the 60GHz finally dies. Then it > sometimes flips. > > > On Oct 19, 2017, at 17:56, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > If a bunch of folks deploy it and do so correctly, there won't be > complaining. ;-) > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:55:08 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > I ain’t belivin nuthing until a bunch of folks have deployed this stuff > and start complaining about it. Then we will have believable data. > > > > *From:* Mike Hammett > > *Sent:* Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:32 PM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > > > https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/ > bulletins/oet70/oet70a.pdf > > page 7 vs. page 15 > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Chris Wright" <ch...@velociter.net> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:28:48 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > Between 50-80GHz, oxygen attenuates the EM spectrum significantly more > than water. Not to say that it doesn’t contribute at all to fade, but at > 300 meters you’d probably only ever go down if Poseiden himself took > offense to your client. > > > > http://windowsil.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/atm_absorption.gif > > > > Chris Wright > > Network Administrator > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett > *Sent:* Thursday, October 19, 2017 1:19 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > > > This link would be just under 300 meters. Will I ever go down for rain? > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> > > To: af@afmug.com > > Sent: 10/19/2017 4:17:00 PM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > > > Yes, it's still an issue. To say otherwise is dumb. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:16:09 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > Is rain fade an issue? > > > > I just read an article claiming that the atmospheric attenuation at 60ghz > is so great that at any range where 60ghz will operate the rain fade is > insignificant. > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> > > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > > Sent: 10/19/2017 2:58:56 PM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > > > Yes, and the LR brackets. They should just drop the regular bracket and > make everyone order the decent ones. > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > At 1300m will I really need a scope to align it? > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Chris Wright" <ch...@velociter.net> > > To: af@afmug.com > > Sent: 10/19/2017 2:41:28 PM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > > > I have a 1300 meter link on PTP60-35 radios doing -59/-61. Very happy with > them. The mounts they come with are trash. Get the “long range” brackets > and alignment scope. > > > > Chris Wright > > Network Administrator > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett > *Sent:* Thursday, October 19, 2017 11:12 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > > > I have a microwave shot about 3 blocks long, so 60ghz seems like an option. > > > > Have any of you tried IgniteNet? Has it been reliable for you? > > > > I don't actually need a gigabit in this case, I just need it to be up. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carl Peterson > > *PORT NETWORKS* > > 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 > > Baltimore, MD 21202 > > (410) 637-3707 > > > > > > > > -- -- bp part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
