I tried Bridgewave back in the day of Daniel. Did not have a good experience.  
So far nothing has changed my mind about that band.  And I am in Utah....

From: Eric Kuhnke 
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

Please don't let your impression of 60 GHz be influenced by IgniteNet's silly 
USB dongle in front of a reflector, cheap stuff...  

Bridgewave (REMEC/Mosely) and others make much more expensive, carrier grade, 
fiber-connected 60 GHz PTP equipment that is good for five nines reliability at 
500 to 650 meters in a Seattle-like rain zone. Somewhat less distance in places 
that have higher mm/hour rain rates. These are serious products that take 
direct 48VDC power, singlemode fiber connections, and have dedicated management 
interfaces. 

"serious" 60 GHz equipment is built to the same standards as $15,000 80 GHz 
links and is used by a lot of large ISPs. Most of whom don't consider 
themselves to be WISPs, but rather ISPs that happen to use PTP millimeter wave 
when it is necessary or justified.

I have not personally seen a Metrolinq 60 GHz but I have seen photos of one 
disassembled, and it is literally a USB 802.11ad 60 GHz dongle hot glued to a 
plastic thing in front of a reflector. Scary.





On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  Well hell, that is almost TMI.  I expected as such from this band.  Sounds 
like if they increase the sensitivity of the switchover mechanism it would be a 
contender.  

  From: Matt Hoppes 
  Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:38 PM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

  Let me back up. 

  We lose our IN link every time a bird pees. It generally holds up during 
torrential down pours. 

  Random fog events will cause it to become trashed. 

  The link is .6 miles. I expected it to fade from time to time. The problem 
for me is the fail over does not happen properly. 

  It's a gosh darn USB dongle attached to a reflector dish. Don't expect too 
much out of it. 

  On Oct 19, 2017, at 18:28, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:


    How far is your shot?  What channel are you using?



    Rory



    From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
    Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:26 PM
    To: af@afmug.com
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq



    I disagree. We lose our IN link every time it rains. And the 5GHz does not 
fail over seemleasly at all. 



    There is packet loss and high pings until the 60GHz finally dies. Then it 
sometimes flips. 


    On Oct 19, 2017, at 17:56, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

      If a bunch of folks deploy it and do so correctly, there won't be 
complaining.  ;-)



      -----
      Mike Hammett
      Intelligent Computing Solutions

      Midwest Internet Exchange

      The Brothers WISP






--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
      To: af@afmug.com
      Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:55:08 PM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

      I ain’t belivin nuthing until a bunch of folks have deployed this stuff 
and start complaining about it.  Then we will have believable data.  



      From: Mike Hammett 

      Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:32 PM

      To: af@afmug.com 

      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq



      
https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet70/oet70a.pdf

      page 7 vs. page 15



      -----
      Mike Hammett
      Intelligent Computing Solutions

      Midwest Internet Exchange

      The Brothers WISP






--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: "Chris Wright" <ch...@velociter.net>
      To: af@afmug.com
      Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:28:48 PM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

      Between 50-80GHz, oxygen attenuates the EM spectrum significantly more 
than water. Not to say that it doesn’t contribute at all to fade, but at 300 
meters you’d probably only ever go down if Poseiden himself took offense to 
your client.



      http://windowsil.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/atm_absorption.gif



      Chris Wright

      Network Administrator



      From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
      Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 1:19 PM
      To: af@afmug.com
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq



      This link would be just under 300 meters.  Will I ever go down for rain? 





      ------ Original Message ------

      From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net>

      To: af@afmug.com

      Sent: 10/19/2017 4:17:00 PM

      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq



        Yes, it's still an issue. To say otherwise is dumb.



        -----
        Mike Hammett
        Intelligent Computing Solutions

        Midwest Internet Exchange

        The Brothers WISP






------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
        To: af@afmug.com
        Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:16:09 PM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

        Is rain fade an issue?  



        I just read an article claiming that the atmospheric attenuation at 
60ghz is so great that at any range where 60ghz will operate the rain fade is 
insignificant.





        ------ Original Message ------

        From: "Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>

        To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>

        Sent: 10/19/2017 2:58:56 PM

        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq



          Yes, and the LR brackets.  They should just drop the regular bracket 
and make everyone order the decent ones.  



          On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

          At 1300m will I really need a scope to align it?





          ------ Original Message ------

          From: "Chris Wright" <ch...@velociter.net>

          To: af@afmug.com

          Sent: 10/19/2017 2:41:28 PM

          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq



            I have a 1300 meter link on PTP60-35 radios doing -59/-61. Very 
happy with them. The mounts they come with are trash. Get the “long range” 
brackets and alignment scope.



            Chris Wright

            Network Administrator



            From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
            Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 11:12 AM
            To: af@afmug.com
            Subject: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq



            I have a microwave shot about 3 blocks long, so 60ghz seems like an 
option.



            Have any of you tried IgniteNet?  Has it been reliable for you?



            I don't actually need a gigabit in this case, I just need it to be 
up.











          -- 

          Carl Peterson

          PORT NETWORKS

          401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

          Baltimore, MD 21202

          (410) 637-3707 







Reply via email to