and it never will. But science and politicians don’t seem to go together very well.
Mark > On Mar 1, 2018, at 3:55 PM, Keefe John <[email protected]> wrote: > > There's a whole county in Wisconsin who's trying to get 4.9 ghz Mikrotik's to > service mobile police cars. They've been working on it for the better part > of 7 years and have invested over a million dollars into the project. It > still doesn't work. > > Keefe > > On 3/1/2018 2:05 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: >> I liked when the lieutenant at the Toledo police department called us up and >> threatened to come out and shut down our 2.4 AP’s because we were supposedly >> interfering with their ill conceived plan to use WiFi to communicate with >> police cars all over town. >> >> Pretty laughable given that we didn’t have anything in their jurisdiction - >> or even any 2.4 in use. >> >> Mark >> >>> On Mar 1, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Down south they call it "All hat, and no cattle." >>> >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> On 3/1/2018 8:51 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>> Yeah, it would be nice to see a ruling to stop this from happening again >>>> in the future... but my guess is that it's really just an empty threat, >>>> and he has no intention of actually suing anybody. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Steve Jones <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> I think this is worth pushing to the nth. I like caselaw, fresh caselaw >>>> that stiffens historic caselaw. I would really like to see at the end of >>>> the day, the letter recipients divvying up airebeams assets with some >>>> sanctions against the attorneys office. We should do a gofundme in the >>>> industry for the recipients to afford the litigation, no settlement, no >>>> dismissal, make it get to a ruling. >>>> >>>> where johnny Cochran >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> I wonder how often this kind of thing works to just scare people off >>>> though... I assume they'd eventually lose an actual lawsuit, but even if >>>> the new guys know that, there's a good chance that they're not going to >>>> want to go through the whole mess of getting sued, and just try to keep >>>> out of their way. >>>> >>>> Personally, I think asking nicely to try to avoid interfering with the >>>> stuff you have up would be a lot more effective... >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:48 AM, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>> wrote: >>>> Any local judge would be preempted by FCC. >>>> >>>> From: Steve Jones <> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 7:20 AM >>>> To: [email protected] <> >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet >>>> >>>> Yeah, that letter isnt about fcc stuff, its about willfully impeding and >>>> incumbants operations. This fcc talk os what theyre probably expecting the >>>> people to focus on, but thats not their target. This could be interesting >>>> to see play out, hopefully it does end up in court just to get fresh >>>> caselaw. The new operators in the area may suffer a bit if injunctions are >>>> in play, but if they weather it, theyll win, probably get some time and >>>> trouble dough in their pockets too. >>>> >>>> On Mar 1, 2018 7:42 AM, "Chris Fabien" <[email protected] <>> wrote: >>>> They can't stop you, but they can sue you! Can sue anybody for anything in >>>> this country right? >>>> >>>> In reality, I think the real answer is, the FCC rules on unlicensed freqs >>>> and how a judge might interpret a case for damages due to lost business >>>> due to provable radio interference, may be two totally different >>>> situations. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected] >>>> <>> wrote: >>>> Send them the Part 15 rules...they can't stop you. >>>> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >>>> On Feb 28, 2018 9:26 PM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected] <>> wrote: >>>> We cover one of the areas with Airebeam and we can’t install over their >>>> old customers fast enough. Ken is backed up at least 3 times what we are >>>> backed up. >>>> >>>> >>>> Rory >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <>] On Behalf Of Steve Jones >>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:12 PM >>>> To: [email protected] <> >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet >>>> >>>> >>>> all you need to know about this outfit >>>> >>>> >>>> " Today is a Great Day! I cancelled my Airebeam account and switched to >>>> another company. This company has the worst customer service. They also >>>> have horrible internet service. They are very unresponsive when there is >>>> an issue. (and if they did respond, they always blamed the router.) In my >>>> opinion, Greg does not take the responsibility of owning a business and >>>> providing quality seriously. >>>> Follow up note: >>>> When Steven (installer) contacted me to pick up equipment, he stated >>>> equipment that wasn't even theirs. He then proceeded to yell at me. I >>>> explained to him that he was never to contact me again. The owner, instead >>>> of finding a solution, threatened to file theft charges. I am more than >>>> happy to return their equipment, but I don't have to put up with their >>>> abusive employees." >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.yelp.com/biz/airebeam-arizona-city >>>> <https://www.yelp.com/biz/airebeam-arizona-city> >>>> >>>> not that BBB is legit, but there is this >>>> https://www.bbb.org/phoenix/business-reviews/internet-providers/airebeam-broadband-in-arizona-city-az-1000033070/reviews-and-complaints >>>> >>>> <https://www.bbb.org/phoenix/business-reviews/internet-providers/airebeam-broadband-in-arizona-city-az-1000033070/reviews-and-complaints> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected] >>>> <>> wrote: >>>> >>>> man, that sucks. He probably paid this lawyer too. >>>> >>>> >>>> wouldnt it be crazy though if this was a loophole nobody thought of cause >>>> its too dumb to work, but we didnt take into account the level of dumb in >>>> the judiciary >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected] <>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Two guys in Arizona got them but my guess is these people are just >>>> fishing. I’ve got my attorneys looking it over and I’m going to make an >>>> inquiry to the Attorney General’s office tomorrow. >>>> >>>> >>>> Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO >>>> >>>> 4226 S. 37 <https://maps.google.com/?q=4226+S.+37&entry=gmail&source=g>th >>>> Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040 >>>> >>>> 602-426-0542 <tel:%28602%29%20426-0542> >>>> [email protected] <> >>>> www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/> >>>> >>>> >>>> “Yesterdays Home Runs don’t win todays games!” >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
