Toledo Ohio?  Aren't you in FL? :)

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mark Radabaugh 
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 2:05 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet


  I liked when the lieutenant at the Toledo police department called us up and 
threatened to come out and shut down our 2.4 AP’s because we were supposedly 
interfering with their ill conceived plan to use WiFi to communicate with 
police cars all over town.   


  Pretty laughable given that we didn’t have anything in their jurisdiction - 
or even any 2.4 in use.


  Mark



    On Mar 1, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Down south they call it "All hat, and no cattle."




bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 3/1/2018 8:51 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:

      Yeah, it would be nice to see a ruling to stop this from happening again 
in the future... but my guess is that it's really just an empty threat, and he 
has no intention of actually suing anybody.



      On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

        I think this is worth pushing to the nth. I like caselaw, fresh caselaw 
that stiffens historic caselaw. I would really like to see at the end of the 
day, the letter recipients divvying up airebeams assets with some sanctions 
against the attorneys office. We should do a gofundme in the industry for the 
recipients to afford the litigation, no settlement, no dismissal, make it get 
to a ruling.  


        where johnny Cochran 


        On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

          I wonder how often this kind of thing works to just scare people off 
though... I assume they'd eventually lose an actual lawsuit, but even if the 
new guys know that, there's a good chance that they're not going to want to go 
through the whole mess of getting sued, and just try to keep out of their way.


          Personally, I think asking nicely to try to avoid interfering with 
the stuff you have up would be a lot more effective...



          On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:48 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

            Any local judge would be preempted by FCC.  

            From: Steve Jones 
            Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 7:20 AM
            To: af@afmug.com 
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet

            Yeah, that letter isnt about fcc stuff, its about willfully 
impeding and incumbants operations. This fcc talk os what theyre probably 
expecting the people to focus on, but thats not their target. This could be 
interesting to see play out, hopefully it does end up in court just to get 
fresh caselaw. The new operators in the area may suffer a bit if injunctions 
are in play, but if they weather it, theyll win, probably get some time and 
trouble dough in their pockets too.

            On Mar 1, 2018 7:42 AM, "Chris Fabien" <ch...@lakenetmi.com> wrote:

              They can't stop you, but they can sue you! Can sue anybody for 
anything in this country right?  

              In reality, I think the real answer is, the FCC rules on 
unlicensed freqs and how a judge might interpret a case for damages due to lost 
business due to provable radio interference, may be two totally different 
situations. 

              On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Jaime Solorza 
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:

                Send them the Part 15 rules...they can't stop you. 


                Jaime Solorza

                On Feb 28, 2018 9:26 PM, "Rory Conaway" 
<r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:

                  We cover one of the areas with Airebeam and we can’t install 
over their old customers fast enough.  Ken is backed up at least 3 times what 
we are backed up.



                  Rory



                  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve 
Jones
                  Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:12 PM
                  To: af@afmug.com
                  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet



                  all you need to know about this outfit 



                  " Today is a Great Day!  I cancelled my Airebeam account and 
switched to another company. This company has the worst customer service. They 
also have horrible internet service. They are very unresponsive when there is 
an issue. (and if they did respond, they always blamed the router.) In my 
opinion, Greg does not take the responsibility of owning a business and 
providing quality seriously.
                  Follow up note:
                  When Steven (installer) contacted me to pick up equipment, he 
stated equipment that wasn't even theirs. He then proceeded to yell at me. I 
explained to him that he was never to contact me again. The owner, instead of 
finding a solution, threatened to file theft charges. I am more than happy to 
return their equipment, but I don't have to put up with their abusive 
employees."



                  https://www.yelp.com/biz/airebeam-arizona-city



                  not that BBB is legit, but there is this 
https://www.bbb.org/phoenix/business-reviews/internet-providers/airebeam-broadband-in-arizona-city-az-1000033070/reviews-and-complaints



                  On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Steve Jones 
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

                  man, that sucks. He probably paid this lawyer too.



                  wouldnt it be crazy though if this was a loophole nobody 
thought of cause its too dumb to work, but we didnt take into account the level 
of dumb in the judiciary



                  On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Rory Conaway 
<r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:





                  Two guys in Arizona got them but my guess is these people are 
just fishing.  I’ve got my attorneys looking it over and I’m going to make an 
inquiry to the Attorney General’s office tomorrow.



                  Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO

                  4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040

                  602-426-0542

                  r...@triadwireless.net

                  www.triadwireless.net



                  “Yesterdays Home Runs don’t win todays games!”

















Reply via email to