The first problem with this is the system probably isn’t even legal.
Mikrotik doesn’t have any certifications in 4.9Ghz, let alone
high-power mask.
Rory
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Radabaugh
*Sent:* Thursday, March 1, 2018 2:52 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet
and it never will. But science and politicians don’t seem to go
together very well.
Mark
On Mar 1, 2018, at 3:55 PM, Keefe John <keefe...@ethoplex.com
<mailto:keefe...@ethoplex.com>> wrote:
There's a whole county in Wisconsin who's trying to get 4.9 ghz
Mikrotik's to service mobile police cars. They've been working on it
for the better part of 7 years and have invested over a million
dollars into the project. It still doesn't work.
Keefe
On 3/1/2018 2:05 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
I liked when the lieutenant at the Toledo police department called
us up and threatened to come out and shut down our 2.4 AP’s
because we were supposedly interfering with their ill conceived
plan to use WiFi to communicate with police cars all over town.
Pretty laughable given that we didn’t have anything in their
jurisdiction - or even any 2.4 in use.
Mark
On Mar 1, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com
<mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Down south they call it "All hat, and no cattle."
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 3/1/2018 8:51 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yeah, it would be nice to see a ruling to stop this from
happening again in the future... but my guess is that it's
really just an empty threat, and he has no intention of
actually suing anybody.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Steve Jones
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
I think this is worth pushing to the nth. I like caselaw,
fresh caselaw that stiffens historic caselaw. I would really
like to see at the end of the day, the letter recipients
divvying up airebeams assets with some sanctions against the
attorneys office. We should do a gofundme in the industry for
the recipients to afford the litigation, no settlement, no
dismissal, make it get to a ruling.
where johnny Cochran
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Mathew Howard
<mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I wonder how often this kind of thing works to just scare
people off though... I assume they'd eventually lose an actual
lawsuit, but even if the new guys know that, there's a good
chance that they're not going to want to go through the whole
mess of getting sued, and just try to keep out of their way.
Personally, I think asking nicely to try to avoid interfering
with the stuff you have up would be a lot more effective...
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:48 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
Any local judge would be preempted by FCC.
*From:*Steve Jones
*Sent:*Thursday, March 1, 2018 7:20 AM
*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet
Yeah, that letter isnt about fcc stuff, its about willfully
impeding and incumbants operations. This fcc talk os what
theyre probably expecting the people to focus on, but thats
not their target. This could be interesting to see play out,
hopefully it does end up in court just to get fresh caselaw.
The new operators in the area may suffer a bit if injunctions
are in play, but if they weather it, theyll win, probably get
some time and trouble dough in their pockets too.
On Mar 1, 2018 7:42 AM, "Chris Fabien" <ch...@lakenetmi.com
<mailto:ch...@lakenetmi.com>> wrote:
They can't stop you, but they can sue you! Can sue anybody
for anything in this country right?
In reality, I think the real answer is, the FCC rules on
unlicensed freqs and how a judge might interpret a case
for damages due to lost business due to provable radio
interference, may be two totally different situations.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Jaime Solorza
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com
<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Send them the Part 15 rules...they can't stop you.
Jaime Solorza
On Feb 28, 2018 9:26 PM, "Rory Conaway"
<r...@triadwireless.net <mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
wrote:
We cover one of the areas with Airebeam and we can’t
install over their old customers fast enough. Ken is
backed up at least 3 times what we are backed up.
Rory
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of
*Steve Jones
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:12 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet
all you need to know about this outfit
" Today is a Great Day! I cancelled my Airebeam account
and switched to another company. This company has the
worst customer service. They also have horrible internet
service. They are very unresponsive when there is an
issue. (and if they did respond, they always blamed the
router.) In my opinion, Greg does not take the
responsibility of owning a business and providing quality
seriously.
Follow up note:
When Steven (installer) contacted me to pick up equipment,
he stated equipment that wasn't even theirs. He then
proceeded to yell at me. I explained to him that he was
never to contact me again. The owner, instead of finding a
solution, threatened to file theft charges. I am more than
happy to return their equipment, but I don't have to put
up with their abusive employees."
https://www.yelp.com/biz/airebeam-arizona-city
not that BBB is legit, but there is this
https://www.bbb.org/phoenix/business-reviews/internet-providers/airebeam-broadband-in-arizona-city-az-1000033070/reviews-and-complaints
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Steve Jones
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
man, that sucks. He probably paid this lawyer too.
wouldnt it be crazy though if this was a loophole nobody
thought of cause its too dumb to work, but we didnt take
into account the level of dumb in the judiciary
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Rory Conaway
<r...@triadwireless.net <mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
wrote:
Two guys in Arizona got them but my guess is these people
are just fishing. I’ve got my attorneys looking it over
and I’m going to make an inquiry to the Attorney General’s
office tomorrow.
*Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO*
*4226 S. 37
<https://maps.google.com/?q=4226+S.+37&entry=gmail&source=g>^th
Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
*602-426-0542 <tel:%28602%29%20426-0542>*
*r...@triadwireless.net <mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>*
*www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>*
/“Yesterdays Home Runs don’t win todays games!”/
