PFFT,
 Thats like using a screwdriver as a hammer. WTH!


On 03/01/2018 02:55 PM, Keefe John wrote:

There's a whole county in Wisconsin who's trying to get 4.9 ghz Mikrotik's to service mobile police cars.  They've been working on it for the better part of 7 years and have invested over a million dollars into the project.  It still doesn't work.

Keefe


On 3/1/2018 2:05 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
I liked when the lieutenant at the Toledo police department called us up and threatened to come out and shut down our 2.4 AP’s because we were supposedly interfering with their ill conceived plan to use WiFi to communicate with police cars all over town.

Pretty laughable given that we didn’t have anything in their jurisdiction - or even any 2.4 in use.

Mark

On Mar 1, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com <mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Down south they call it "All hat, and no cattle."


bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 3/1/2018 8:51 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yeah, it would be nice to see a ruling to stop this from happening again in the future... but my guess is that it's really just an empty threat, and he has no intention of actually suing anybody.

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    I think this is worth pushing to the nth. I like caselaw, fresh
    caselaw that stiffens historic caselaw. I would really like to
    see at the end of the day, the letter recipients divvying up
    airebeams assets with some sanctions against the attorneys
    office. We should do a gofundme in the industry for the
    recipients to afford the litigation, no settlement, no
    dismissal, make it get to a ruling.

    where johnny Cochran

    On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Mathew Howard
    <mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        I wonder how often this kind of thing works to just scare
        people off though... I assume they'd eventually lose an
        actual lawsuit, but even if the new guys know that, there's
        a good chance that they're not going to want to go through
        the whole mess of getting sued, and just try to keep out of
        their way.

        Personally, I think asking nicely to try to avoid
        interfering with the stuff you have up would be a lot more
        effective...

        On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:48 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com
        <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:

            Any local judge would be preempted by FCC.
            *From:* Steve Jones
            *Sent:* Thursday, March 1, 2018 7:20 AM
            *To:* af@afmug.com
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet
            Yeah, that letter isnt about fcc stuff, its about
            willfully impeding and incumbants operations. This fcc
            talk os what theyre probably expecting the people to
            focus on, but thats not their target. This could be
            interesting to see play out, hopefully it does end up
            in court just to get fresh caselaw. The new operators
            in the area may suffer a bit if injunctions are in
            play, but if they weather it, theyll win, probably get
            some time and trouble dough in their pockets too.
            On Mar 1, 2018 7:42 AM, "Chris Fabien"
            <ch...@lakenetmi.com> wrote:

                They can't stop you, but they can sue you! Can sue
                anybody for anything in this country right?
                In reality, I think the real answer is, the FCC
                rules on unlicensed freqs and how a judge might
                interpret a case for damages due to lost business
                due to provable radio interference, may be two
                totally different situations.
                On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Jaime Solorza
                <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:

                    Send them the Part 15 rules...they can't stop you.

                    Jaime Solorza
                    On Feb 28, 2018 9:26 PM, "Rory Conaway"
                    <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:

                        We cover one of the areas with Airebeam and
                        we can’t install over their old customers
                        fast enough.  Ken is backed up at least 3
                        times what we are backed up.


                        Rory


                        *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
                        Behalf Of *Steve Jones
                        *Sent:* Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:12 PM
                        *To:* af@afmug.com
                        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this
                        letter yet


                        all you need to know about this outfit


                        " Today is a Great Day!  I cancelled my
                        Airebeam account and switched to another
                        company. This company has the worst
                        customer service. They also have horrible
                        internet service. They are very
                        unresponsive when there is an issue. (and
                        if they did respond, they always blamed the
                        router.) In my opinion, Greg does not take
                        the responsibility of owning a business and
                        providing quality seriously.
                        Follow up note:
                        When Steven (installer) contacted me to
                        pick up equipment, he stated equipment that
                        wasn't even theirs. He then proceeded to
                        yell at me. I explained to him that he was
                        never to contact me again. The owner,
                        instead of finding a solution, threatened
                        to file theft charges. I am more than happy
                        to return their equipment, but I don't have
                        to put up with their abusive employees."


                        https://www.yelp.com/biz/airebeam-arizona-city
                        <https://www.yelp.com/biz/airebeam-arizona-city>


                        not that BBB is legit, but there is this
                        
https://www.bbb.org/phoenix/business-reviews/internet-providers/airebeam-broadband-in-arizona-city-az-1000033070/reviews-and-complaints
                        
<https://www.bbb.org/phoenix/business-reviews/internet-providers/airebeam-broadband-in-arizona-city-az-1000033070/reviews-and-complaints>


                        On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Steve
                        Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

                        man, that sucks. He probably paid this
                        lawyer too.


                        wouldnt it be crazy though if this was a
                        loophole nobody thought of cause its too
                        dumb to work, but we didnt take into
                        account the level of dumb in the judiciary


                        On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Rory
                        Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote:



                        Two guys in Arizona got them but my guess
                        is these people are just fishing. I’ve got
                        my attorneys looking it over and I’m going
                        to make an inquiry to the Attorney
                        General’s office tomorrow.


                        *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •**CEO*

                        *4226 S. 37
                        
<https://maps.google.com/?q=4226+S.+37&entry=gmail&source=g>^th
                        Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*

                        *602-426-0542 <tel:%28602%29%20426-0542>*

                        *r...@triadwireless.net*

                        *www.triadwireless.net
                        <http://www.triadwireless.net/>*

                        **

                        /“Yesterdays Home Runs don’t win todays
                        games!”/











--

Reply via email to