On 5/4/07, Mike Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/3/07, Lukasz Stafiniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > But how does Speagram resolve ambiguities like this one? ;-)
> >
> Generally, Speagram would live with both interpretations until one of
> them fails or it gets a chance to ask the user.
How would that be possible? I don't even know how to imagine such a thing.
Well, we hope to implement Speagram on Nondeterministic Turing Machine
once they build it. ;-)
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
