How do you interact with, and how does your idea of advanced AGI act without being embodied?
I dont see how it can without being embodied (VR at least), *to some extent*, and the more embodied, the more complicated actions that can be allowed. A personal assistant AGI could be attached to a cell phone with GPS, and use a VR of our real world to know where we are at all times, assist with scheduling, and use google maps to plot out where we need to go and when, but would have to internally represent all this data. What level of internal representation such as this will qualify as embodiment? _______________________________________ James Ratcliff - http://falazar.com Looking for something... --- On Wed, 8/13/08, Jim Bromer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Jim Bromer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [agi] The Necessity of Embodiment To: agi@v2.listbox.com Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 7:04 AM There is a another reason why embodied agi is useful. That is because the challenge will provide some discipline for the programmer who might otherwise never confront the structural problems that I believe are fundamental to the problem of developing genuine agi. Jim Bromer ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=111637683-c8fa51 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
