On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No, it doesn't justify ad-hoc, even when perfect solution is >> impossible, you could still have an optimal approximation under given >> limitations. > > So what is an optimal approximation under uncertainty? How do you know when > you've gotten there? > > If you don't believe in ad-hoc then you must have an algorithmic solution . > . . . >
I pointed out only that it doesn' follow from AIXI that ad-hoc is justified. -- Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://causalityrelay.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
