Cool. And you're saying that intelligence is not computable. So why else
are we constantly invoking AIXI? Does it tell us anything else about
general intelligence?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Mahoney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <agi@v2.listbox.com>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] If your AGI can't learn to play chess it is no AGI
--- On Fri, 10/24/08, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The value of AIXI is not that it tells us how to solve AGI.
The value is that it tells us intelligence is not computable
Define "not computable" Too many people are
incorrectly interpreting it to mean "not implementable on a
computer".
Not implementable by a Turing machine. AIXI says the optimal solution is to
find the shortest program consistent with observation so far. This implies
the ability to compute Kolmogorov complexity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity
-- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
