dispite the multiple DLEs the wall clock time is not shorter
than the dumptime, check use of inparallel and maxdump and
you should be able to get some concurrency, not that running
into the work day is an issue with this config, but its good
to practice and now about it later.

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 04:04:16PM -0500, upengan78 wrote:
> #Congratulations on a successful amdump! 
> 
> Wow, tell you what I am so happy to see those words! Thanks much!
> 
> By the time I saw your reply, I had impatiently split my single DLE into 9 
> DLEs which also includes the last one for excluding all 8 DLEs on the top.
> 
> I did see same message again in the amdump summary : 
>   taper: Will request retry of failed split part.
>   taper: tape TEST-1 kb 9845830 fm 15 [OK]
>   taper: tape TEST-2 kb 6661060 fm 7 [OK]
> 
> But now that I read your reply, I think it just doesn't mean a lot as long as 
> I see OK below that particular message. Here is full DUMP summary :
> These dumps were to tapes TEST-1, TEST-2.
> The next 6 tapes Amanda expects to use are: 6 new tapes.
> The next 6 new tapes already labelled are: TEST-3, TEST-4, TEST-5, TEST-6, 
> TEST-7, TEST-8
> 
> 
> STATISTICS:
>                           Total       Full      Incr.
>                         --------   --------   --------
> Estimate Time (hrs:min)     0:10
> Run Time (hrs:min)          1:51
> Dump Time (hrs:min)         1:38       1:38       0:00
> Output Size (meg)        16120.0    16120.0        0.0
> Original Size (meg)      30661.6    30661.6        0.0
> Avg Compressed Size (%)     52.6       52.6        --
> Filesystems Dumped             9          9          0
> Avg Dump Rate (k/s)       2809.3     2809.3        --
> 
> Tape Time (hrs:min)         0:17       0:17       0:00
> Tape Size (meg)          16120.0    16120.0        0.0
> Tape Used (%)              157.4      157.4        0.0
> Filesystems Taped              9          9          0
> Parts Taped                   22         22          0
> Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  16506.9    16506.9        --
> 
> USAGE BY TAPE:
>   Label               Time         Size      %    Nb    Nc
>   TEST-1             0:10    10485219k  100.0     8    15
>   TEST-2             0:07     6661060k   63.5     2     7
> 
> NOTES:
>   planner: Adding new disk TEST.domain.com:/bk/location/./apple2007.
>   planner: Adding new disk TEST.domain.com:/bk/location/./apple2008.
>   planner: Adding new disk TEST.domain.com:/bk/location/./apple2009.
>   planner: Adding new disk TEST.domain.com:/bk/location/./apple2010.
>   planner: Adding new disk TEST.domain.com:/bk/location/./pear2008.
>   planner: Adding new disk TEST.domain.com:/bk/location/./pear2009.
>   planner: Adding new disk TEST.domain.com:/bk/location/./pear2010.
>   planner: Adding new disk TEST.domain.com:/bk/location/./other.
>   planner: Adding new disk TEST.domain.com:/bk/location/./_rest_.
>   taper: Will request retry of failed split part.
>   taper: tape TEST-1 kb 9845830 fm 15 [OK]
>   taper: tape TEST-2 kb 6661060 fm 7 [OK]
>   big estimate: TEST.domain.com /bk/location/./apple2007 0
>                   est: 244128k    out 119306k
>   big estimate: TEST.domain.com /bk/location/./apple2009 0
>                   est: 834272k    out 521751k
>   big estimate: TEST.domain.com /bk/location/./apple2010 0
>                   est: 3646880k    out 2857940k
> 
> 
> DUMP SUMMARY:
>                                        DUMPER STATS               TAPER STATS
> HOSTNAME     DISK        L ORIG-kB  OUT-kB  COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s MMM:SS    
> KB/s
> -------------------------- ------------------------------------- 
> --------------
> TEST.domain.co -u/./_rest_ 0 2981200 2155287   72.3    7:25 4838.8   2:05 
> 17242.3
> TEST.domain.co -./apple2007 0  488140  119306   24.4    1:40 1188.0   0:06 
> 19884.3
> TEST.domain.co -./apple2008 0 6484400 3803120   58.7   28:08 2253.5   4:23 
> 14460.5
> TEST.domain.co -./apple2009 0 1668440  521751   31.3    3:17 2642.9   0:29 
> 17991.4
> TEST.domain.co -./apple2010 0 7308970 2857940   39.1   22:30 2117.1   2:46 
> 17216.5
> TEST.domain.co -tu/./other 0 5833440 3828839   65.6   18:01 3542.5   3:44 
> 17093.0
> TEST.domain.co -pear2008 0   88010   46283   52.6    0:23 2040.3   0:02 
> 23141.5
> TEST.domain.co -pear2009 0 4127930 1932585   46.8    9:16 3475.2   1:53 
> 17102.5
> TEST.domain.co -pear2010 0 2416990 1241776   51.4    7:15 2853.0   1:12 
> 17246.9
> 
> (brought to you by Amanda version 3.1.1)
> 
> 
> Now I am thinking about, removing runtapes option completely, and add 
> splitdisk_buffer option to the holding disk, I am confused about one thing, 
> why you mentioned that "looks like your splits are about 0.5GB. " I have 
> actually set tape_splitsize = 1Gb although I do have fallback_splitsize = 
> 512MB . Do you mean I should grow this value to a higher value or you said 
> that about tape_splitsize value?
> 
> Other than this, your explanation was really informative and thanks again for 
> that.
> 
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by upendra.gan...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
---
   Brian R Cuttler                 brian.cutt...@wadsworth.org
   Computer Systems Support        (v) 518 486-1697
   Wadsworth Center                (f) 518 473-6384
   NYS Department of Health        Help Desk 518 473-0773



IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally
privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure.  It
is intended only for the addressee.  If you received this in error or
from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not
distribute, copy or use it or any attachments.  Please notify the
sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your
system. Thank you for your cooperation.


Reply via email to