I'm OK with the 2 list format also. The subjects of the tracker messages are not significantly different from the subjects of the list messages. Too much separation and the sourceforge interface will grow stagnant and important information or questions posted there by people not on the list or new to aolserver or whatever will just be ignored.
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 04:18 pm, (Via wrote: > On 2002.10.22, David Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I liked everything the way it was. > > You liked having the SourceForge tracker messages going to > the same mailing list that the rest of the discussion was > going to? > > I personally don't mind it either: my MUA (Mutt) is studly, > and through mutt filtering and procmail filtering kung-fu, I > process about 3000 emails a month (that I read -- I receive > about 7000 a month, 4000 of which I mostly file away and > eventually delete). Without this extraordinary setup, I don't > think I could possibly manage the volume ... > > However, in consideration for other people who are far less > masterful in their mail kungfu, I'm perfectly happy splitting > the SF tracker messages to their own dedicated mailing lists. > I'll route them to the same places they go now, so it's > transparent to me, anyway ... > > However, I'm curious to hear your reasons for liking things > the way they currently are. > > -- Dossy
