On Friday 11 April 2008 16:25, Don Baccus wrote: > On Apr 11, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Tom Jackson wrote: > > Regardless of whether this gets integrated with ns_return, or as a > > config, it > > is much better to start out with a new API, such as the ns_returnz or > > ns_return_compress. > > I would much rather have this be controlled by configuration > parameters. We want to be able to write code for distribution using > ns_return, and allow those who deploy it to control whether gzip > compression is used or not when they configure their service.
I agree, I'll stop confusing the issue. Please see my previous comments. tom jackson -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
