fastastically written, some very valid points in here.i have some thoughts. Will type them out later
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:06 IST V S Rawat wrote: >On 9/11/2009 6:56 PM India Time, _ichord_ wrote: > >> I am hearing the words mediocre and average being thrown around in >> some places to describe Blue's music in some reviews. Guys, how can >> such brilliant work be average? > >It is a person's personal judgment whether a work is brilliant. > >Similarly, it is some other person's personal judgment whether a work is > not brilliant, and is mediocre, below average. > >> The depth of compositions and >> intricate orchestration and arrangements is anything BUT average or >> below. Even saying above average is a huge understatement. > >You started with "lyrics are said to be bad", then you take a switch to >"music is good" to say that "thus, lyrics also have to be good". see for >yourself. It is not really logical line of thinking. > >"depth of compositions and intricate orchestration and arrangements" is >one aspect of the song, and that may be brilliant. Similarly, words/ >lyrics are another a different aspect of the song and they may be >mediocre/ below average while other aspects of songs are brilliant. One >part being great doesn't make an entire song great. One part being >wanting doesn't make overall song lacking. > >For example, in recent times, chak de india's song kuch kariye had such >lovely, heart touching, earthly lyrics by an unknown "Jaideep Sahni" >that would do even a Gulzar or Ghalib or Meer proud, but the music, was >just ok, went too fast to let people absorb the lyrics, and the khichdi >of "loud in comparison" "chak de India" refrain, and female chorus, >backgroun just "killed/ murdered/spoiled" the beauty of the mukhda/ >stanza portion of lyrics. This song should be taught in class room as >the perfect case how to kill great lyrics. > >Similarly, Taare Zameen Par, had excellent hearth touching lyrics in >"dekho inhein hain os ki boondein", tune, music also good, still the >song went a tad slow, too soft, introvert, subdued that it didn't get >the prominence it could have deserved. "Maa" of the same movie were too >emotional in lyrics, music and singing that it deserve to not get >popular, irrespective of award it fetched for the singer. > >Again, all these are my personal judgment. > >ARR's Zindagi of Yuvraj has everything great, music, lyrics, whatever >else. However, Ghajini's Kaise mujhe though we all like that a lot, now >I think that that song is lacking something that I can't pinpoint >really. may be, it went a tad too loud, sort of a "declaration" for a >emotional song that should have been introspective - a la zindagi. > >But, other songs of ghajini -- and I am not speaking of latto and >bachchoo which were intentionally kept cheap, had poor lyrics. The most >popular guzarish had lyrics that a 10th standard child poet might write, >just putting rhyming words matching scale - no thought, no concept, no >inner beauty, no content - that was wordsmithing, words being fitted to >give the shape of a song like a menial worker putting physical things to >fit in a shape. Even then it got popular. > >Coming to lyrics of ballooo, blooo, ullooo, falloo, there are good urdu >words put at places, that had not earlier been used much in ARR songs, >so they sound good. But that is it and that is all. There is not much >depth vibrating through entire song. These are just individual separate >pieces that are good lyrics, but none of the entire song is a single >whole entity having a life of its own, no single thought or line of >thought peeking from the entire songs. > >It is a general feeling that ARR is quite confident (though I think "too >proud" would have explained it better but that would hurt several of >you) about his musical instincts and creativity, and I concede that >rightly so, but that makes him ignore lyrics "intentionally". Seems as >if he considers lyrics are necessary evil and he is compromising the >greatness of his music by putting lyrics in it. Sometimes he gets good >poets so good lyrics come up but not as a rule of ARR songs, just >because of the individual presence of a good lyrics writer who is not >ready to compromise. Seems ARR's standard of lyrics is as low as >"jurrasic park mein sundar se jode rap music gaaye jam ke" or "patti >rap" or "latka jhatka" or "telephone dhun mein hansne wali" sort of >cheapness presented in the name of lyrics. > >Again, all these are my personal judgment. > >Blue lyrics are better than Ghajini's, but still writer is appeaing as >novice who might have good potential in future, but is a kid learning >and experimenting at present. > >Again, all these are my personal judgment. > >Coming to music, I have been hearing Blue now for most of some 48 hours, > and my conclusion is this. > >Blue music sounds so rich and complex as none of ARR's earlier album had >been in toto till now. > >But, it lacks content, it is showbiz, it is decorative, it is soulless, >it is all glitter and nothing else. I am listening to it and liking the >beats etc., but it is not giving me internal intellectual emotional >satisfaction that several of ARR's earlier words had given me. > >I don't know how many of you have heard "muqabla" in last one year or >decade, that once went so popular that dozens of copycats mushroomed on >it, its copies even went in two full fledged hindi movies, but how many >of us are still listening it, how many of us listen to hello doctor or >Kay Sara Sara. Such songs have a smaller lifespan. New catchy beats make >them popular and then mind memorizes the beats pattern and the song >looses charm leaving nothing emotional/ intellectual for the heart/ mind >to cherish, and the song becomes boring or dead. > >Blue songs are also like that. Will go very popular but will die after >that and no one will humm them or listen to them while they still go and >will keep on going back to Dil Se after 11 years of its release or >Rangeela or Taal or Bombay or Guru after years and ages of their release. > >Blue is ARR becoming commercial, though I agree that being commercial is >not a bad thing in a commercial world. But, in blue, ARR has become >purely 100% commercial, compromising his inner instinct of what he knew >and trusted and gave for his fans' various tastes. This is not a good >indication of the things that future holds from ARR and for ARR. > >Thanks for putting me into blabbering spree. >-- >Rawat > > >> Keep in mind, I'm not downing anyone who doesn't like the music due >> to personal taste...have no problem with that. But to call the music >> average when it is clearly musically superior in compositional terms >> is just false. >> >> I can't believe how much I'm posting about Blue's music. You can >> tell I'm very excited and very happy.....almost bubbling with joy and >> can't contain myself from posting here to express it! >> >> Thanks Gopal for creating a group that allows me to post my thoughts >> and feelings so freely!! >> > Connect more, do more and share more with Yahoo! India Mail. Learn more. http://in.overview.mail.yahoo.com/