That's exactly right Scott.
Also I'm not looking to be critical of him. For all I know his
postion may have moved to something I agree with, in which case I
will gladly compliment him.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "asburycouple" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> If I understand your question Tom, you are trying to understand
the
> apparent conflict between the anti eminent domain position Jim has
> taken and the use of eminent domain as the vechicle to acquire
> property in the plan led by Jim. On the surface I understand the
> dilema. However, Reading the quotes it is clear that Jim is not
so
> anti eminant domain as he is against taking property through
eminent
> domain againt the current property owner's wishes.
>
> But they are fair questions and deserve a fair response. Rather
> than get into another ridiculous dialog of back and forth
symantics
> over what Jim thinks - perhaps Jim you could articulate your
> position here yourself. Here are the questions as I understand
them:
>
> What is your position regarding the use or complete suspension of
> eminent domain?
>
> If you are against using it in an involuntary situation, what is
> your plan for the Springwood redevelopment regarding those who
will
> not be willing to sell their property?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, but you are quoting the article directly. In the article,
the
> > same statement wasn't presented as a quote. And it's eminent not
> emenant.
> > Honestly, this is becoming an anti-Keady witchhunt.
> > I think it's your response to his article in the TCN.
> >
> > Jack
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > >
> > > No Jack I inquired from the microphone if the Plan includes
> using
> > > Emenant Domain of properties. The answer was yes.
> > >
> > > May I now have the favor of your opinion on the matter?
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nice try, but I think you need to read the APP article
again.
> Keady
> > > > didn't say "The city could use its power of eminent domain
to
> > > acquire
> > > > all properties in the area for development."
> > > > The writer did.
> > > > Oops
> > > >
> > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > > > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not going to comment on this because I don't want to
be
> seen
> > > > > as being hard on the Councilman. I'm just going to post
> these
> > > facts
> > > > > and ask all of you to comment on it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Particularly you, Kevin Brown.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This from the Coaster, 06/28/06:
> > > > >
> > > > > New Jersey should enact a moratorium on eminent domain,
> Asbury
> > > Park City
> > > > > Councilman James Keady said at a rally held at city hall
on
> > > Friday.
> > > > >
> > > > > Keady said in Asbury Park the city council must have the
> courage
> > > to
> > > > > stand up to Larry Fishman, the chief executive officer of
> Asbury
> > > > > Partners, the city's redeveloper, and tell him won't allow
> him
> > > > > to take residents property from them against their will.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Very generally, no properties should be taken against the
> will
> > > of
> > > > > the owners," Keady said.
> > > > >
> > > > > This from Life Net News, 6/28/06:
> > > > >
> > > > > Two City councilmen, Ed Johnson and Jim Keady, are
> > > outspoken
> > > > > critics of the use of eminent domain and refuse to vote to
> take
> > > property
> > > > > unless the owners request it. Both of the local
> representatives
> > > believe
> > > > > that redevelopment can occur without eminent
> > > domain. "Redevelopment
> > > > > should help the homeowners and the businesses that are in
an
> area
> > > > > that's considered blighted," said Keady. "It shouldn't run
> them
> > > > > out of that area."
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Last night, the Springwood Avenue Redevelopment Proposal
was
> > > introduced.
> > > > > The Chairman of the Committee that wrote it is Jim
Keady.
> From
> > > > > today's Asbury Park Press:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The city could use its power of eminent domain to acquire
> all
> > > properties
> > > > > in the area for development.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please tell me what you think.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Tommy.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
