--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
It's not just Keady it's Johnson too. I don't know if he visits this
group but he should answer those questions too.
That's exactly right Scott.
>
> Also I'm not looking to be critical of him. For all I know his
> postion may have moved to something I agree with, in which case I
> will gladly compliment him.
>
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "asburycouple" <asburycouple@>
> wrote:
> >
> > If I understand your question Tom, you are trying to understand
> the
> > apparent conflict between the anti eminent domain position Jim
has
> > taken and the use of eminent domain as the vechicle to acquire
> > property in the plan led by Jim. On the surface I understand the
> > dilema. However, Reading the quotes it is clear that Jim is not
> so
> > anti eminant domain as he is against taking property through
> eminent
> > domain againt the current property owner's wishes.
> >
> > But they are fair questions and deserve a fair response. Rather
> > than get into another ridiculous dialog of back and forth
> symantics
> > over what Jim thinks - perhaps Jim you could articulate your
> > position here yourself. Here are the questions as I understand
> them:
> >
> > What is your position regarding the use or complete suspension of
> > eminent domain?
> >
> > If you are against using it in an involuntary situation, what is
> > your plan for the Springwood redevelopment regarding those who
> will
> > not be willing to sell their property?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, but you are quoting the article directly. In the article,
> the
> > > same statement wasn't presented as a quote. And it's eminent
not
> > emenant.
> > > Honestly, this is becoming an anti-Keady witchhunt.
> > > I think it's your response to his article in the TCN.
> > >
> > > Jack
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No Jack I inquired from the microphone if the Plan includes
> > using
> > > > Emenant Domain of properties. The answer was yes.
> > > >
> > > > May I now have the favor of your opinion on the matter?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Nice try, but I think you need to read the APP article
> again.
> > Keady
> > > > > didn't say "The city could use its power of eminent domain
> to
> > > > acquire
> > > > > all properties in the area for development."
> > > > > The writer did.
> > > > > Oops
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > > > > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not going to comment on this because I don't want to
> be
> > seen
> > > > > > as being hard on the Councilman. I'm just going to post
> > these
> > > > facts
> > > > > > and ask all of you to comment on it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Particularly you, Kevin Brown.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This from the Coaster, 06/28/06:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > New Jersey should enact a moratorium on eminent domain,
> > Asbury
> > > > Park City
> > > > > > Councilman James Keady said at a rally held at city hall
> on
> > > > Friday.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Keady said in Asbury Park the city council must have the
> > courage
> > > > to
> > > > > > stand up to Larry Fishman, the chief executive officer of
> > Asbury
> > > > > > Partners, the city's redeveloper, and tell him won't
allow
> > him
> > > > > > to take residents property from them against their will.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Very generally, no properties should be taken against
the
> > will
> > > > of
> > > > > > the owners," Keady said.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This from Life Net News, 6/28/06:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Two City councilmen, Ed Johnson and Jim Keady, are
> > > > outspoken
> > > > > > critics of the use of eminent domain and refuse to vote
to
> > take
> > > > property
> > > > > > unless the owners request it. Both of the local
> > representatives
> > > > believe
> > > > > > that redevelopment can occur without eminent
> > > > domain. "Redevelopment
> > > > > > should help the homeowners and the businesses that are in
> an
> > area
> > > > > > that's considered blighted," said Keady. "It shouldn't
run
> > them
> > > > > > out of that area."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last night, the Springwood Avenue Redevelopment Proposal
> was
> > > > introduced.
> > > > > > The Chairman of the Committee that wrote it is Jim
> Keady.
> > From
> > > > > > today's Asbury Park Press:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The city could use its power of eminent domain to acquire
> > all
> > > > properties
> > > > > > in the area for development.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please tell me what you think.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tommy.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
