I wanted to share this graph, of my right channel. The red curve is the measured response, the pink one the theoretical result after the "extreme" correction is applied, and the blue one the measure after the "extreme" EQ is applied.
A few comments. First, the reality is quite different from the therory, but I was expecting it anyway. Then the graph shows a rather good job of the correction in the low frequencies, which is well percieved in listening. The mid upper freq are still messed up, even if some kind of improvement is brought by limiting the amplitude of the variations below 1kHz. In the treble... it's terrible, looks like the comb effect is measured here (my mike was moved about 10 cm to the left between the 2 measures). I'll take new sets of measures again anyway, I am thinkin g of waking up very early because tonight it was terrible, turcks on the street, boats on the river horning, and then... fireworks Is there a way to parameter things in order to have a very strong correction in the bass (let's say below 200 Hz) and keep things untouched above, and if there is, is it desirable? +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Filename: extreme.jpg | |Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3342| +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Chinanico ____________________________________________________________________________________ CEC TL51X / SB3 > Audiomat Maestro > Jeff Rowland Concentra 2 > System Audio SA2K ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chinanico's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12794 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35615 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
