acousticsguru;230225 Wrote: > I realise ezkcdude is able to defend himself and don't mean to patronize > you people, but that's probably not why he said that ("Because there > aren't enough of you guys?"), just that if there were more people like > me, that audiophile Squeezebox to replace one's CD-transport (without > DAC and output stage, but a WC input and the relevant digital outputs) > might already be a reality. Needless to say, this is where I started > this thread from: reading through forums here and elsewhere, I got the > impression I'm not alone in wanting this. > > > > *Proven?* Where? > > Greetings from Switzerland, David.
Sorry my mistake - I should have said "demonstrated" not "proven" - clearly these products are not bedevilled by the effects of jitter, measurable and/or audible. So a wordclock is "not essential" for that purpose, there are other methods. -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... ...SB3+TACT+Altmann+MF DACXV3/Linn tri-amped Aktiv 5.1 system and some very expensive cables ;o) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38637 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles