Quad;409695 Wrote: > One argument for the Transporter: It is able to play 96kHz files. > > As long as the most common way to get digital music is ripping standard > CDs it's not a big advantage. But the more you can buy music online the > more I would love being able to play the best quality offered. > > I'm extremely happy with my Duet/DacMagic but I just can't afford a > Transporter. > > As you can see, I'm still convinced that a Transporter simply -has to- > sound at least as good as a SB+DAC. And I experienced myself that a > SB+DAC sounds better than a plain SB. No ABX-test, white noise or sound > meter is needed. Would you really consider blind-testing scotch single > malt vs. bourbon? ;-)
...and a small counter-argument: 24/96 don't sound ANY different to 24/48... :-) -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... SB3 (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Digital,Kimber Speaker & Chord Interconnect cables Outdoors: Boom ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=61686 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
