magiccarpetride;637280 Wrote: > That premise gets invalidated when we conduct an abx test where both a > and b are identical, and yet we get the results that indicate > statistically significant deviation. I disagree. This identifies noise in the results, it doesn't invalidate the test.
IMO, any test where you've taken noise into consideration is generally better than tests where this hasn't been done. magiccarpetride;637280 Wrote: > Right there, you know that the test is bullshit. So you prefer ignorance over disturbing knowledge? ;) -- Soulkeeper -that is not dead which can eternal lie. and with strange aeons even death may die.- touch (sans caps) + duet + boom + radio (portable) / dd-wrt on linksys wrt160n / sbs 7.6 on w7(x86) with avira free ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Soulkeeper's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35297 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=88345 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
