Mnyb wrote: > I'm surprised that there are no 24/192 version available yet, they must > sound soo much better ;)
Sorry to disappoint you but back in the 1920's when the recordings were made there was only 6 bits (75 cents) available and the only digital elements involved were Armstrong's fingers. But all kidding aside, these recordings, as well many other early jazz recordings, just prove that great music always trumps not so great music, no matter how much better the recording may be. Case in point: "Jazz at the Pawn Shop" versus these spectacular early Louis Armstrong recordings. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
