TheOctavist wrote: > DSD/SACD has no use... > > it is good in one application. mastering straight from analogue. when > done this way (from analog master straight to sacd disk) it retains the > properties that make it advantageous. however.. > > if one uses a DSD recorder, or processes the file in *any* way outside > of the first scenario above, all advantages are lost, due to HF present > in the source signal hitting a second delta sigma modulator.
I have also come to the same observation. Only the analog to DSD seem to be good. I have a few SACDs but never bothered to buy more. Same goes for high-res. I have some 44.1/16 which are equally good. Actually, the original recording/transfer matters more than the format. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SoftwireEngineer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7000 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97950 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
