arnyk wrote: > To me this makes very good sense. SP/DIF is a very simple and generally > reliable and low-overhead protocol, whereas USB is not. > > USB is obviously superior in the very many cases where there is no > SP/DIF port at hand, but the Touch addressed that problem long ago. > > I'm of the opinion that digital-analog conversion is best delayed to as > close to the speaker terminals as possible, all other things being at > least equal. Yes you share the same inability to understand the device as ralphpnj - who is also a poster on the thread for the afflicted & disaffected ""Reformed Audiophile True Confessions" - so you share a lot in common
------------------------------------------------------------------------ jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
