artee wrote: > An interesting result. It appears that the tester can reliably identify > a difference, but of what - given that the 24/192 hi-res was upsampled > from the 16/44 lo-res. Full marks to the tester for doing an ABX and > publishing the results, though.
Indeed - and the full thread is good reading. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
