Julf wrote: > Indeed - and the full thread is good reading. I find the recent Gearslutz posts by a long term casual sighted evaluation advocate to be repetitive and disappointing. It is like damning DBTs with faint praise.
Detection of synthesized ultrasonic pseudo-audio signals in a DBT seems to mean very little. It's like saying that you can taste the difference between the cheapest margarine and the finest butter. The person who is posting this report has posted this irrelevant report and senseless report here before in the recent past. It is a not a personal report but a report that was dredged up on the web that dates back to 2013. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
