jkeny wrote: > Would anyone,other than those taking personal pot-shots, care to suggest > what is wrong with the advice I gave JH901? >
A basic rule of debating which seems to have been repeatedly ignored is that -*it is proper is to attack the issue*-, but *-it is improper to attack the personal properties of the person raising the issue-*. For a clear example of a personal attack Jkeny, let's take a recent post wherein you personally attacked me based on a false claim about my age. I can provide an image of my Driver's license that has my correct and legal age on it which is most definitely different than what you falsely claimed, for the obvious purpose of ridiculing me. Do I need to provide a link to it Jkeny, (http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?96407-What-is-the-best-top-end-player-now&p=821933&viewfull=1#post821933) or can you still remember it? ;-) > > Does anyone disagree that he should identify & isolate an aspect of the > sound that he can reliably differentiate both sighted & blind before ABX > testing? Of course, I do. It is logically impossible to reliably and accurately identify and isolate an aspect of sound using sighted evaluations due to their many flaws which lead to both false positive and false negative outcomes. The operative word here being *-false-*, you know like your irrelevant and false claim about my age. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
