On 11 Mar 2016, at 9:16 AM, Optusnet <jjsincl...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > At some point some poor bunny has to put their neck on the block and be > prepared to look your wife and kids in the eye and say. " I conducted his AFR > as required by a approved revalidation program, a program that is authorised > by an authority that has been shown to lower the risk of sailplane flying. I > am terribly sorry and devastated that he has had a fatal accident however he > deliberately chose to -insertSOPbreachhere- and that substantially increased > the risk to his operation. My sign off on his AFR was very clear in the > expectation to follow the guidance given by those that authorise our > operation.
Incidentally: People die in aircraft all the time, and what you just wrote never happens. It’s 24 carat rolled-gold bullshit. Giving someone a flight review is not the same as taking responsibility for their safety. Their safety is their responsibility. The fact that GFA has deliberately gone out of their way to implement a misalignment between safety responsibility and safety accountability adds unnecessary complexity, but doesn’t change anything else. - mark _______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
