On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Kaushalye Kapuruge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1. But when it comes to submodule prefix, could this be a problem? Say I
> need to use prefix
> [rampart][oxs] for OMXMLSecurity and
> [rampart][util] for Utility module etc.
> Would that be a big issue if we give the freedom of passing the prefix?
My suggestion was don't let the user pass the prefix. Instead the
prefix will be set at "submodule" level. You could overwrite the
define directive at the Rampart util level (if that's what you want),
#undef PREFIX
#define PREFIX "[rampart][util]"
So when you call the logging macro, the correct prefix will be taken
automatically.
Bye,
-Chintana
--
http://engwar.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
