Good. One of the reasons Mac OS X doesn't suffer the DLL hell of Windows is that it has a much smaller range of hardware to support.
You can't complain about not being able to tinker and then if you do go and tinker it being Apple's fault it doesn't work. Just don't use Apple products and stop moaning about it. On 5 Feb 2010, at 16:57, Scot McSweeney-Roberts wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 15:16, Alex Mace <a...@hollytree.co.uk> wrote: >> If you want to run Mac OS X on Dell hardware, go right ahead, Apple won't >> stop you. I don't see why Apple, with a minority share in the computer >> market, should officially support you doing that. > > > No, Apple will actively stop me from doing it, by making subtle > changes to the OS to ensure it won't run, such as actively not > supporting Atom processors. > > http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/31/hackintosh-netbook-users-take-note-snow-leopard-10-6-2-update-kills-support-for-atom-processor/ > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please > visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial list archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
