Job lost connection ...

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Lionel PLASSE <pla...@cofiem.fr>
Envoyé : dimanche 5 novembre 2023 08:00
À : Lionel PLASSE <pla...@cofiem.fr>; Bill Arlofski <w...@protonmail.com>; 
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : RE: [Bacula-users] fd lose connection

I upgraded net device drivers to last version
I change some network adapters conf (Broadcom netxtrem2) and gain some Mb/s (up 
to 10 now)
Backup still running.

Will see if it achieve job well

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Lionel PLASSE <pla...@cofiem.fr>
Envoyé : vendredi 3 novembre 2023 22:02
À : Bill Arlofski <w...@protonmail.com>; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] fd lose connection

Yes , you're right

But the job work well for an other machine through the same vpn  and the job 
last 9hours .
And from the hardware vpn gateway,  I don't have much configuration choice.  It 
could be a direction.

Could it be a problem of Debian 12 which seems not to be official for Bacula 
v13 ?

"SD calls Client" directive was activated , don't know why ( I tried so many 
conf to solve it :).  I will re-test without

And for the slow rate I am trying the Network buffer size directive on FD and 
SD  but not really conclusive.
But :   Error: lib/bsock.c:397 Wrote 65566 bytes to client:192.168.0.4:9102, 
but only 65536 accepted
Tells me to look after the send and receive buffer on network drivers ....

Bacula doc :
Note, on certain Windows machines, there are reports that the transfer rates 
are very slow and this seems to be related to the default 65,536 size. On 
systems where the transfer rates seem abnormally slow compared to other 
systems, you might try setting the Maximum Network Buffer Size to 32,768 in 
both the File daemon and in the Storage daemon ...
The default size was chosen to be relatively large but not too big in the case 
that you are transmitting data over Internet. It is clear that on a high speed 
local network, you can increase this number and improve performance. For 
example, some users have found that if you use a value of 65,536 bytes they get 
five to ten times the throughput. Larger values for most users don’t seem to 
improve performance. If you are interested in improving your backup speeds, 
this is definitely a place to experiment. You will probably also want to make 
the corresponding change in each of your File daemons conf files.

I'm disappointed, and made so many inoperant conf changes , that I will try to 
with v9.6.6 ( I used before on my lan)  to see if the problem is the same .

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to