From: Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
To: "David van Ooijen" <davidvanooi...@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, 30 November, 2011, 10:18
Thank you for this.
So, if I understand you right, the early lute players could all
transpose tablature on sight - have you any evidence for this
assertion?
You also suggest we shouldn't discuss such matters....... I wonder why?
MH
--- On Wed, 30/11/11, David van Ooijen <davidvanooi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
From: David van Ooijen <davidvanooi...@gmail.com>
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
To: "Baroque Lute List (E-mail)" <baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Date: Wednesday, 30 November, 2011, 9:32
On 30 November 2011 09:54, Martyn Hodgson
<[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> lute required for a particular pitch and tuning. If singers
couldn't
> transpose sufficiently (because of their particular vocal range)
then
> the lute part would have to be re-intabulated or a different sized
> instrument employed; tho' this seems an extreme remedy
Transposing lute song (intabulated parts) isn't that hard for an
experienced player. No need to write it out, no need to write about
it. I think we (I at least) do it all the time. I'll notate a bass
line if it's complicated. On the other hand, like Bob Spencer, I do
carry around a set of transposed Dowland songs. :-)
The discussion started on baroque lutes. Not many lute songs with
intabulated parts for those. If anything, there will be a continuo
part. No need to even discuss transposing: just do it.
David
--
*******************************
David van Ooijen
[2]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
www.davidvanooijen.nl
*******************************
To get on or off this list see list information at
[3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
2. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=davidvanooi...@gmail.com
3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
