+1 (I don't mean make it 1+1=2 implementations, I just say it's a very good new [and old ;-) ] idea ;-)
thanks --- tony _____________________________________________ "Simple, clear purpose and principles give rise to complex and intelligent behavior. Complex rules and regulations give rise to simple and stupid behavior." --- Dee Hock > -----Original Message----- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 1:03 AM > To: BESS > Subject: [bess] Introducing a one-implementation requirement before WG > last calls > > Hello everyone, > > Following the positive feedback received during BESS meeting in Yokohama > about introducing a one-implementation requirement in BESS, we propose to > do the following for future WG last calls: > > As a prerequisite before doing a working group last call on a document, the > chairs will ask the working group for known implementations of the > specifications; a relatively detailed level of information will be required > (e.g. > "release x.y of solution z shipping date d", "all features implemented", > "partial implementation only", etc.) and everyone will be invited to reply > (not > only co-authors of the specifications); the chairs will then do the working > group last call if satisfying information was provided on at least one > implementation. > > We are open for comments on this proposal until December 7th. > > Martin & Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
