If that's what can be agreed on, I'm for it ... That puts at least something in terms of reality check between things being paper and going into STD tracks ...
thanks --- tony _____________________________________________ "Simple, clear purpose and principles give rise to complex and intelligent behavior. Complex rules and regulations give rise to simple and stupid behavior." --- Dee Hock > -----Original Message----- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 1:29 AM > To: bess@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [bess] Introducing a one-implementation requirement before > WG last calls > > WG, > > we have reviewed the different comments posted on the list in response to > our initial proposal. > After thinking further about that, we'd like to propose the following as a way > forward: > > At the same time we issue a Working Group Last Call we would ask for > knowledge of existing implementations, and the more details provided at > that time, the better. > In the situation where an implementation would exist we would proceed > with submission to IESG. > In the opposite situation (no implementation exists), we would systematically > ask the WG for reasoned opinions regarding whether we should nevertheless > proceed with submission to IESG. > We will gauge consensus on that aspect. In case consensus is in favour of > proceeding with submission to IESG we will do so. In the opposite case, we > will put the document in a "Waiting for implementation" state until > information on an existing implementation is brought to our knowledge or of > the WG. > > Please share your views on that. > > Thank you > > M&T > > > Le 24/11/2015 10:03, Thomas Morin a écrit : > > Hello everyone, > > > > Following the positive feedback received during BESS meeting in > > Yokohama about introducing a one-implementation requirement in BESS, > > we propose to do the following for future WG last calls: > > > > As a prerequisite before doing a working group last call on a > > document, the chairs will ask the working group for known > > implementations of the specifications; a relatively detailed level of > > information will be required (e.g. "release x.y of solution z shipping > > date d", "all features implemented", "partial implementation only", > > etc.) and everyone will be invited to reply (not only co-authors of > > the specifications); the chairs will then do the working group last > > call if satisfying information was provided on at least one implementation. > > > > We are open for comments on this proposal until December 7th. > > > > Martin & Thomas > > > > _______________________________________________ > > BESS mailing list > > BESS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
