Martin, Sounds like solid and reasonable approach!
Regards, Jeff > On Dec 14, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Martin Vigoureux > <martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > > WG, > > we have reviewed the different comments posted on the list in response to our > initial proposal. > After thinking further about that, we'd like to propose the following as a > way forward: > > At the same time we issue a Working Group Last Call we would ask for > knowledge of existing implementations, and the more details provided at that > time, the better. > In the situation where an implementation would exist we would proceed with > submission to IESG. > In the opposite situation (no implementation exists), we would systematically > ask the WG for reasoned opinions regarding whether we should nevertheless > proceed with submission to IESG. > We will gauge consensus on that aspect. In case consensus is in favour of > proceeding with submission to IESG we will do so. In the opposite case, we > will put the document in a "Waiting for implementation" state until > information on an existing implementation is brought to our knowledge or of > the WG. > > Please share your views on that. > > Thank you > > M&T > > > Le 24/11/2015 10:03, Thomas Morin a écrit : >> Hello everyone, >> >> Following the positive feedback received during BESS meeting in Yokohama >> about introducing a one-implementation requirement in BESS, we propose >> to do the following for future WG last calls: >> >> As a prerequisite before doing a working group last call on a document, >> the chairs will ask the working group for known implementations of the >> specifications; a relatively detailed level of information will be >> required (e.g. "release x.y of solution z shipping date d", "all >> features implemented", "partial implementation only", etc.) and everyone >> will be invited to reply (not only co-authors of the specifications); >> the chairs will then do the working group last call if satisfying >> information was provided on at least one implementation. >> >> We are open for comments on this proposal until December 7th. >> >> Martin & Thomas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
