Martin, for me this seems a reasonable way forward
On 14/12/15 10:28, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" <bess-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: >WG, > >we have reviewed the different comments posted on the list in response >to our initial proposal. >After thinking further about that, we'd like to propose the following as >a way forward: > >At the same time we issue a Working Group Last Call we would ask for >knowledge of existing implementations, and the more details provided at >that time, the better. >In the situation where an implementation would exist we would proceed >with submission to IESG. >In the opposite situation (no implementation exists), we would >systematically ask the WG for reasoned opinions regarding whether we >should nevertheless proceed with submission to IESG. >We will gauge consensus on that aspect. In case consensus is in favour >of proceeding with submission to IESG we will do so. In the opposite >case, we will put the document in a "Waiting for implementation" state >until information on an existing implementation is brought to our >knowledge or of the WG. > >Please share your views on that. > >Thank you > >M&T > > >Le 24/11/2015 10:03, Thomas Morin a écrit : >> Hello everyone, >> >> Following the positive feedback received during BESS meeting in Yokohama >> about introducing a one-implementation requirement in BESS, we propose >> to do the following for future WG last calls: >> >> As a prerequisite before doing a working group last call on a document, >> the chairs will ask the working group for known implementations of the >> specifications; a relatively detailed level of information will be >> required (e.g. "release x.y of solution z shipping date d", "all >> features implemented", "partial implementation only", etc.) and everyone >> will be invited to reply (not only co-authors of the specifications); >> the chairs will then do the working group last call if satisfying >> information was provided on at least one implementation. >> >> We are open for comments on this proposal until December 7th. >> >> Martin & Thomas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
