alex lupu wrote: > I'd like to offer a very strong (but polite) dissenting voice about the > subject of NO-NO updating/upgrading "in place" which came up here once again.
> IRONICALLY, the one and only problem that could possibly be ascribed to > working "in place" is _exactly_ (and coincidentally) the one described > in the (original) subject of this thread. I don't know where anyone said that you shouldn't update packages in place. Except for glibc, I've been doing it when required for years. As for updating gcc, the better instructions for gcc are in BLFS, not LFS. BTW, this entire thread should be in LFS support, not BLFS support. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
